Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Original Article
  • Published:

Epidermal growth factor (hEGF) has no effect on murine intestine epithelial damage and regeneration after melphalan

Abstract

The effect of epidermal growth factor (hEGF) on intestinal epithelial damage by melphalan was explored in CBA mice. Human EGF was administered in doses of 100 micrograms kg-1 or 1000 micrograms kg-1 using a variety of schedules. Mucosal damage was assessed 4, 8 and 13 days later, by [14C]-xylose uptake and by microcolony survival of jejunum, ileum and colon. The only regimen to show enhanced jejunal crypt survival was administration of hEGF, 100 micrograms kg-1, i.p., 8 hourly, beginning 24 h before melphalan treatment. Oral administration of hEGF had no effect on melphalan induced damage nor on subsequent recovery of intestinal mucosa. Activity of hEGF in mice was confirmed by demonstration of precocious eyelid opening in newborn mice. No consistent protective or restorative effect of hEGF on melphalan-induced intestinal epithelial damage could be demonstrated with the doses and schedules used.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Robinson, B., Clutterbuck, R., Millar, J. et al. Epidermal growth factor (hEGF) has no effect on murine intestine epithelial damage and regeneration after melphalan. Br J Cancer 52, 733–737 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1985.251

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.1985.251

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links