Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Clinical Research
  • Published:

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients (≥75 years) affected by localized prostate cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis from the IPOPROMISE study

Abstract

Background

Prostate Cancer (PCa) is the second leading cause of cancer death in the elderly (≥75 years). There is currently little data on hypofractionated radiotherapy in older patients affected by localized PCa. We present the long-term results of hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients with localized PCa from the IPOPROMISE database.

Materials and Methods

retrospective analysis of 719 PCa elderly (≥75 years) patients treated with daily volumetric image-guided hypofractionated radiotherapy between 2007 and 2020. For survival endpoints, we used Kaplan-Meier survival curves and univariate and multivariable Cox’s proportional hazards regression models.

Results

Median age at PCa diagnosis was 78.4 years (interquartile [IQR], 76.8–80.3 years), 74% of patients had a modified Charlson co-morbidity index (elderly-PCa-CCI, (e-PCCI)) of 0. Based on NCCN risk grouping, 399 patients (55.5%) were affected by unfavorable to very high-risk disease. Median follow-up was 4.2 years (IQR 2.4–6.4 years). 31/719 (4.3%) patients died from any cause. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and metastasis-free survival were 95.6% (95% CI 93.4–97.1%), 99.2% (95%CI 97.9–99.7%), and 97.3% (95% CI 95.1–98.5%), respectively. In multivariate analysis, baseline PSA, and Gleason score were associated with MFS. On univariate analysis, e-PCCI ≥ 2 was associated with OS (p = 0.02). The 5-year freedom from late grade ≥2 gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity were 95.1% (95% CI 93.0–96.5%) and 96.7% (95% CI 93.7–97.1%), respectively.

Conclusions

Our results represent a valuable add-on to the current literature, confirming the prominent role of radiotherapy in the cure of elderly fit patients affected by localized disease.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Survival curves.
Fig. 2: Kaplan–Meier curves stratified by risk class (low: red; favorable-intermediate: blue; unfavorable-intermediate: green; high: yellow; very-high: purple).
Fig. 3: Distribution of acute and late GI and GU toxicity across different grades.
Fig. 4: Late toxicity.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting this study’s findings are available from the corresponding author, GI, upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74:12–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lancia A, Ingrosso G, Carosi A, Bottero M, Cancelli A, Turturici I, et al. Oligometastatic cancer in elderly patients: the “blitzkrieg” radiotherapy approach: SBRT in oligometastatic elderly patients. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2019;31:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, Buyyounouski MK, Patton C, Barocas D, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: An ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA Evidence-Based Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:JCO1801097.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, et al. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021;79:243–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS, Martin JM, Supiot S, Chung PWM, et al. Randomized trial of a hypofractionated radiation regimen for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1884–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, et al. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1047–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee WR, Dignam JJ, Amin MB, Bruner DW, Low D, Swanson GP, et al. Randomized Phase III Noninferiority study comparing two radiotherapy fractionation schedules in patients with low-risk prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2325–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Ingrosso G, Ponti E, Francolini G, Caini S, Fondelli S, Santini R, et al. Image-guided moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a multicentric retrospective study (IPOPROMISE). Radio Med. 2024;129:643–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, Thames H Jr, Schellhammer P, Shipley WU, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:965–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wilson JM, Dearnaley DP, Syndikus I, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, et al. The efficacy and safety of conventional and hypofractionated high-dose radiation therapy for prostate cancer in an elderly population: a subgroup analysis of the CHHiP trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100:1179–89.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Lu-Yao GL, Albertsen PC, Moore DF, Shih W, Lin Y, DiPaola RS, et al. Outcomes of localized prostate cancer following conservative management. JAMA. 2009;302:1202–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Dell’Oglio P, Boehm K, Trudeau V, Tian Z, Larcher A, Leyh-Bannurah SR, et al. Survival after conservative management versus external beam radiation therapy in elderly patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:1037–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wilt TJ, Vo TN, Langsetmo L, Dahm P, Wheeler T, Aronson WJ, et al. Radical prostatectomy or observation for clinically localized prostate cancer: extended follow-up of the Prostate Cancer Intervention Versus Observation Trial (PIVOT). Eur Urol. 2020;77:713–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bokhorst LP, Valdagni R, Rannikko A, Kakehi Y, Pickles T, Bangma CH, et al. A decade of active surveillance in the PRIAS study: an update and evaluation of the criteria used to recommend a switch to active treatment. Eur Urol. 2016;70:954–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bratt O, Folkvaljon Y, Hjälm Eriksson M, Akre O, Carlsson S, Drevin L, et al. Undertreatment of men in their seventies with high-risk nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:53–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lu-Yao GL, Albertsen PC, Moore DF, Lin Y, DiPaola RS, Yao SL. Fifteen-year outcomes following conservative management among men aged 65 years or older with localized prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68:805–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Hamilton AS, Fleming ST, Wang D, Goodman M, Wu XC, Owen JB, et al. Clinical and demographic factors associated with receipt of non guideline-concordant initial therapy for nonmetastatic prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2016;39:55–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Fung C, Dale W, Mohile SG. Prostate cancer in the elderly patient. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2523–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang DD, Mahal BA, Muralidhar V, Boldbaatar N, Labe SA, Nezolosky MD, et al. Receipt of definitive therapy in elderly patients with unfavorable-risk prostate cancer. Cancer. 2017;123:4832–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Akre O, Garmo H, Adolfsson J, Lambe M, Bratt O, Stattin P. Mortality among men with locally advanced prostate cancer managed with noncurative intent: a nationwide study in PCBaSe Sweden. Eur Urol. 2011;60:554–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Daskivich TJ, Luu M, Heard J, Thomas IC, Leppert JT. Overtreatment of prostate cancer among men with limited longevity in the active surveillance era. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;11:e245994.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Dalla Volta A, Palumbo C, Zamboni S, Mazziotti G, Triggiani L, Zamparini M, et al. Heterogeneity in regional changes in body composition induced by androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer patients: potential impact on bone health-the BLADE study. J Endocrinol Invest. 2024;47:335–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tully KH, Nguyen DD, Herzog P, Jin G, Noldus J, Nguyen PL, et al. Risk of dementia and depression in young and middle-aged men presenting with nonmetastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:66–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Eurostat Statistics Explained. 2024 Nov 10. Available from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained.

  25. European Cancer Information System. 2024 Nov 10. Available from https://ecis.jrc.ec.europa.eu.

  26. Roussel B, Ouellet GM, Mohile SG, Dale W. Prostate cancer in elderly men: screening, active surveillance, and definitive therapy. Clin Geriatr Med. 2015;31:615–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

none.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GI, AL, BD, EP, contributed to the study conception and design. EF, SC, CD, GF, MV, LR, contributed to the material preparation. SF, RS, AB, AA, FT, DR, MT, SP, SB, SG, SS, DM, MS, GFa, TS, GM, BS, ADM, RB, AV, contributed to data collection and analysis. LV, CA, GI, BD, AL, SC, CD contributed to the draft of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianluca Ingrosso.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was performed following the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Approval was granted by the Ethical Committee of Regione Umbria (Approval N. 25991/22/ON, 26/10/2022). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Every human participant provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ingrosso, G., Festa, E., Caini, S. et al. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in elderly patients (≥75 years) affected by localized prostate cancer: a multicenter retrospective analysis from the IPOPROMISE study. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-00962-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-025-00962-z

Search

Quick links