Fig. 3: The process of integrating tES with fMRI in a real-time closed-loop approach (Closed-loop tES-fMRI). | Translational Psychiatry

Fig. 3: The process of integrating tES with fMRI in a real-time closed-loop approach (Closed-loop tES-fMRI).

From: Closing the loop between brain and electrical stimulation: towards precision neuromodulation treatments

Fig. 3

(1) Concurrent tES-fMRI starts with prior expectations about optimal tES parameters. (2) Targets are selected based on the clinical/behavioral outcome of interest and its corresponding neurocognitive function. The averaged BOLD signals are extracted from predefined targets. (3) To measure ongoing brain state (e.g., frontoparietal connectivity), the BOLD signal is segmented using a tapered sliding window, and dynamic similarities between extracted BOLD signals in frontoparietal regions of interests (ROIs) are calculated for each segment using the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). (4) Fisher’s Z transformation of those correlation coefficients is used to measure dynamic functional connectivity (FC), i.e., the dynamic correlation between the time series of frontal and parietal ROIs is defined as a model of current brain state over time. (5) The extracted measures are compared with the desired value and the results of the respective comparison are fed into an optimization algorithm. (6) Optimal stimulation parameters are determined to minimize the difference between ongoing FC and the desired value by maximizing the objective function in a defined parameter search space (e.g., 1D search space to optimize the frequency of the injected current or 2D search space to optimize phase difference and frequency simultaneously). (7) The stimulation device is updated with the optimal stimulation parameters for the next round, and this loop continues until predefined stopping criteria are reached. tES transcranial electrical stimulation, fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging, BOLD blood oxygenation level-dependent.

Back to article page