Fig. 6 | Bone Research

Fig. 6

From: Differential bone and vessel type formation at superior and dura periosteum during cranial bone defect repair

Fig. 6

Conditional deletion of VHL in ECs had no appreciable effects on defect healing. Representative images of MicroCT (a1&b1) and MPLSM images (a2-9&b2-10) of the vessel networks around bone defect scanned from dura periosteum. Panel a are images obtained from control VHLf/f mice and panel b are images from VHLΔEC mice. Images (a6-9&b6-10) are reconstructed at 100 μm below surface to show the vessel networks in bone tissue. Quantitative MicroCT analyses to compare bone formation (c) and defect area (d) in VHLf/f and VHLΔEC mice. Quantitative MPLSM analyses to illustrate the volume fractions of the total CD31+ vessels (e), CD31+EMCN+ (f), CD31+EMCN− arterial vessels (g). Col 1a (2.3) GFP+ cells as Cyan, SHG as white, CD31as red and EMCN as green. Isolated CD31+EMCN+ and CD31+EMCN− vessels are shown as green and red as indicated. Scale bar = 200 μm. n = 4, *P < 0.05 by ANOVA. Histologic H&E staining of the defects (h) from VHLf/f and VHLΔEC mice outlining the area of new bone at the repair site. Quantitative histomorphometric analyses (i) to show changes of total new bone formation in VHLf/f and VHLΔEC mice. n = 4, P > 0.05 by Student’s t-test

Back to article page