Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Identification of diabetic retinopathy classification using machine learning algorithms on clinical data and optical coherence tomography angiography

Abstract

Background

To apply machine learning (ML) algorithms to perform multiclass diabetic retinopathy (DR) classification using both clinical data and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA).

Methods

In this cross-sectional observational study, clinical data and OCTA parameters from 203 diabetic patients (203 eye) were used to establish the ML models, and those from 169 diabetic patients (169 eye) were used for independent external validation. The random forest, gradient boosting machine (GBM), deep learning and logistic regression algorithms were used to identify the presence of DR, referable DR (RDR) and vision-threatening DR (VTDR). Four different variable patterns based on clinical data and OCTA variables were examined. The algorithms’ performance were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve (AUC) was used to assess predictive accuracy.

Results

The random forest algorithm on OCTA+clinical data-based variables and OCTA+non-laboratory factor-based variables provided the higher AUC values for DR, RDR and VTDR. The GBM algorithm produced similar results, albeit with slightly lower AUC values. Leading predictors of DR status included vessel density, retinal thickness and GCC thickness, as well as the body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio and glucose-lowering treatment.

Conclusions

ML-based multiclass DR classification using OCTA and clinical data can provide reliable assistance for screening, referral, and management DR populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: ROC curves with sensitivity and specificity for the diabetic retinopathy classification in different patterns.
Fig. 2: Top 10 predictors contributed to the diabetic retinopathy classification based on four patterns in the random forest model.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in the current study is available from the corresponding author upon request.

References

  1. Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, Chee ML, Rim TH, Cheung N, et al. Global prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and projection of burden through 2045: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:1580–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jaimie, Rupert RAB DA, Paul, Seth SB, Hugh RBT RF, Jost BJ, et al. Causes of blindness and vision impairment in 2020 and trends over 30 years, and prevalence of avoidable blindness in relation to VISION 2020: the Right to Sight: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet Glob Health. 2021;9:e144–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, Fawzi A, Lim JI, Vemulakonda GA, et al. Diabetic retinopathy preferred practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:66–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tan GS, Cheung N, Simó R, Cheung GC, Wong TY. Diabetic macular oedema. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017;5:143–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong TY, Sun J, Kawasaki R, Ruamviboonsuk P, Gupta N, Lansingh VC, et al. Guidelines on diabetic eye care: the international council of ophthalmology recommendations for screening, follow-up, referral, and treatment based on resource settings. Ophthalmology 2018;125:1608–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wu JH, Liu TYA, Hsu WT, Ho JH, Lee CC. Performance and limitation of machine learning algorithms for diabetic retinopathy screening: meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23:e23863.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Gulshan V, Peng L, Coram M, Stumpe MC, Wu D, Narayanaswamy A, et al. Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for detection of diabetic retinopathy in retinal fundus photographs. Jama. 2016;316:2402–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gargeya R, Leng T. Automated identification of diabetic retinopathy using deep learning. Ophthalmology. 2017;124:962–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abràmoff MD, Lou Y, Erginay A, Clarida W, Amelon R, Folk JC, et al. Improved automated detection of diabetic retinopathy on a publicly available dataset through integration of deep learning. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2016;57:5200–06.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Li X, Xie J, Zhang L, Cui Y, Zhang G, Chen X, et al. Identifying microvascular and neural parameters related to the severity of diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020;61:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Huang T, Li X, Xie J, Zhang L, Zhang G, Zhang A, et al. Long-term retinal neurovascular and choroidal changes after panretinal photocoagulation in diabetic retinopathy. Front Med. 2021;8:752538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hormel TT, Hwang TS, Bailey ST, Wilson DJ, Huang D, Jia Y. Artificial intelligence in OCT angiography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2021;85:100965.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Sandhu HS, Elmogy M, Taher Sharafeldeen A, Elsharkawy M, El-Adawy N, Eltanboly A, et al. Automated diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy using clinical biomarkers, optical coherence tomography, and optical coherence tomography angiography. Am J Ophthalmol. 2020;216:201–06.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sandhu HS, Eladawi N, Elmogy M, Keynton R, Helmy O, Schaal S, et al. Automated diabetic retinopathy detection using optical coherence tomography angiography: a pilot study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2018;102:1564–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aslam TM, Hoyle DC, Puri V, Bento G. Differentiation of diabetic status using statistical and machine learning techniques on optical coherence tomography angiography images. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020;9:2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zang P, Hormel TT, Wang X, Tsuboi K, Huang D, Hwang TS, et al. A diabetic retinopathy classification framework based on deep-learning analysis of OCT angiography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11:10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ryu G, Lee K, Park D, Kim I, Park SH, Sagong M. A deep learning algorithm for classifying diabetic retinopathy using optical coherence tomography angiography. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Zang P, Gao L, Hormel TT, Wang J, You Q, Hwang TS, et al. DcardNet: diabetic retinopathy classification at multiple levels based on structural and angiographic optical coherence tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2021;68:1859–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang G, Chen H, Chen W, Zhang M. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in China: a multi-hospital-based cross-sectional study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1591–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song P, Yu J, Chan KY, Theodoratou E, Rudan I. Prevalence, risk factors and burden of diabetic retinopathy in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Glob Health. 2018;8:010803.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Wan H, Cai Y, Wang Y, Fang S, Chen C, Chen Y, et al. The unique association between the level of peripheral blood monocytes and the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2020;18:248.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Hasan M, Kotov A, Carcone A, Dong M, Naar S, Hartlieb KB. A study of the effectiveness of machine learning methods for classification of clinical interview fragments into a large number of categories. J Biomed Inf. 2016;62:21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oh E, Yoo TK, Park EC. Diabetic retinopathy risk prediction for fundus examination using sparse learning: a cross-sectional study. BMC Med Inf Decis Mak. 2013;13:106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Blighe K, Gurudas S, Lee Y, Sivaprasad S. Diabetic retinopathy Environment-Wide Association Study (EWAS) in NHANES 2005-2008. J Clin Med. 2020;9:3643.

  25. Ogunyemi OI, Gandhi M, Lee M, Teklehaimanot S, Daskivich LP, Hindman D, et al. Detecting diabetic retinopathy through machine learning on electronic health record data from an urban, safety net healthcare system. JAMIA Open. 2021;4:ooab066.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Cichosz SL, Johansen MD, Knudsen ST, Hansen TK, Hejlesen O. A classification model for predicting eye disease in newly diagnosed people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2015;108:210–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tsao HY, Chan PY, Su EC. Predicting diabetic retinopathy and identifying interpretable biomedical features using machine learning algorithms. BMC Bioinforma. 2018;19:283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ogunyemi O, Kermah D. Machine learning approaches for detecting diabetic retinopathy from clinical and public health records. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015;2015:983–90.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang C, Liu Q, Guo H, Zhang M, Zhang L, Zhang G, et al. Usefulness of machine learning for identification of referable diabetic retinopathy in a large-scale population-based study. Front Med. 2021;8:773881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ogunyemi OI, Gandhi M, Tayek C. Predictive models for diabetic retinopathy from non-image teleretinal screening data. AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2019;2019:472–77.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Li HY, Dong L, Zhou WD, Wu HT, Zhang RH, Li YT, et al. Development and validation of medical record-based logistic regression and machine learning models to diagnose diabetic retinopathy. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2023;261:681–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Li W, Song Y, Chen K, Ying J, Zheng Z, Qiao S, et al. Predictive model and risk analysis for diabetic retinopathy using machine learning: a retrospective cohort study in China. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e050989.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hirano T, Kitahara J, Toriyama Y, Kasamatsu H, Murata T, Sadda S. Quantifying vascular density and morphology using different swept-source optical coherence tomography angiographic scan patterns in diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2019;103:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Su B, Zhu X, Yang K, Xiao Y, Li C, Shi K, et al. Age- and sex-related differences in the retinal capillary plexus in healthy Chinese adults. Eye Vis (Lond). 2022;9:38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Monteiro-Henriques I, Rocha-Sousa A, Barbosa-Breda J. Optical coherence tomography angiography changes in cardiovascular systemic diseases and risk factors: a review. Acta Ophthalmol. 2022;100:e1–e15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Katsimpris A, Karamaounas A, Sideri AM, Katsimpris J, Georgalas I, Petrou P. Optical coherence tomography angiography in Alzheimer’s disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eye. 2022;36:1419–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Duan H, Xie J, Zhou Y, Zhang H, Liu Y, Tang C, et al. Characterization of the Retinal Microvasculature and FAZ Changes in Ischemic Stroke and Its Different Types. Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2022;11:21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Subasi S, Kucuk KD, San S, Cefle A, Tokuc EO, Balci S, et al. Macular and peripapillary vessel density alterations in a large series of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus without ocular involvement. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2022;260:3543–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Saini DC, Kochar A, Poonia R. Clinical correlation of diabetic retinopathy with nephropathy and neuropathy. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2021;69:3364–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_1237_21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. WHO. The global burden of disease 2004 update. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hu Y, Teng W, Liu L, Cheng K, Liu L, Hua R, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetes and diabetic retinopathy in Liaoning province, China: a population-based cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121477.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Rajput D, Wang WJ, Chen CC. Evaluation of a decided sample size in machine learning applications. BMC Bioinforma. 2023;24:48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 82171072), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (grant numbers 2021A1515010921, 2022A1515012073), the Guangzhou Science and Technology Program Project (grant numbers 202002030400); and the Sun Yat-sen Clinical Research Cultivating Program (grant numbers SYS-Q-202104).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XL and XW collected and analysed the data, interpreted the results and wrote the manuscript. XS, QM, XL and GZ analysed and interpreted the data. LZ, YC, XL, YL and QM contributed to discussion and reviewed the manuscript. JL, JX, TH, ZC, ZL and XW collected the data. QM and YL designed this study, analysed the data, interpreted the results and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. QM and YL are the guarantors of this work and had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yuqing Lan or Qianli Meng.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, X., Wen, X., Shang, X. et al. Identification of diabetic retinopathy classification using machine learning algorithms on clinical data and optical coherence tomography angiography. Eye 38, 2813–2821 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03173-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-024-03173-3

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links