Abstract
Erectile dysfunction is a prevalent condition that may impact psychosocial health and quality of life. While various treatment modalities exist, penile prosthesis implantation offers a permanent solution. Surgery, however, carries inherent risks and potential complications. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and risk factors of early postoperative complications after penile prosthesis surgery in a large, multicenter, prospective, cohort study. Data was analyzed from patients participating in the PHOENIX registry, an international study on penile prosthesis surgery conducted by the EAU Research Foundation. Patients were operated on from November 2021 until august 2024 in 30 centers from 8 countries. Our study was not limited to one device or brand, all available inflatable and malleable devices were eligible for inclusion. Postoperative complications were registered at different time points, up to 2 years post-surgery. For this analysis we studied complications that occurred within 2 weeks after surgery. Data on early complications after penile prosthesis surgery of 1072 patients were analyzed. Median age was 62 (range 24–88) years old at time of surgery. A total of 639 (59.6%) patients received a drain perioperatively. A total of 49 patients (4.6%) reported complications within 2 weeks after surgery. Infection occurred in 4 patients and penoscrotal hematoma occurred in 6 patients within 2 weeks post-surgery. A total of 5 patients underwent early revision surgery. There was no significant effect of diabetes mellitus on development of an early postoperative infection (0.4% vs. 0.4%, p = 1.00). We found no significant impact of drain placement on hematoma development (0.3% vs. 0.3%, p = 0.69). We did find that early hematoma occurred more frequently in low-volume versus high-volume centers (1.3% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.02). This large international study confirms that penile prosthesis surgery is a safe procedure with a low rate of early postoperative complications.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
269,00 € per year
only 22,42 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the EAU Research Foundation. Restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under license for this study. Data are available through the corresponding author upon reasonable request, with the permission of the EAU Research Foundation.
References
NIH consensus conference. Impotence. Impotence NIH consensus development panel on impotence. JAMA. 1993;270:83–90.
Corona G, Lee DM, Forti G, O’Connor DB, Maggi M, O’Neill TW, et al. Age-related changes in general and sexual health in middle-aged and older men: results from the European male ageing study (EMAS). J Sex Med. 2010;7:1362–80.
McCabe MP, Althof SE. A systematic review of the psychosocial outcomes associated with erectile dysfunction: does the impact of erectile dysfunction extend beyond a man’s inability to have sex? J Sex Med. 2014;11:347–63.
Salonia A, Bettocchi C, Boeri L, Capogrosso P, Carvalho J, Cilesiz NC, et al. European association of urology guidelines on sexual and reproductive health—2021 update: male sexual dysfunction. Eur Urol. 2021;80:333–57.
Barton GJ, Carlos EC, Lentz AC. Sexual quality of life and satisfaction with penile prostheses. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:178–88.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S, et al. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1180–6.
Van Huele A, Mennes J, Chung E, Van Renterghem K. Majority of erectile dysfunction patients would have preferred earlier implantation of their penile prosthesis: validation of the recently changed EAU guidelines. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:731–5.
Levine LA, Becher E, Bella A, Brant W, Kohler T, Martinez-Salamanca JI, et al. Penile prosthesis surgery: current recommendations from the international consultation on sexual medicine. J Sex Med. 2016;13:489–518.
Carvajal A, Benavides J, García-Perdomo HA, Henry GD. Risk factors associated with penile prosthesis infection: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:587–97.
O’Rourke TK, Erbella A, Zhang Y, Wosnitzer MS. Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:S832–48.
Scherzer ND, Dick B, Gabrielson AT, Alzweri LM, Hellstrom WJG. Penile prosthesis complications: planning, prevention, and decision making. Sex Med Rev. 2019;7:349–59.
Van Renterghem K, Deho F. Perspective on the PHOENIX trial: prospective registry for patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation for male erectile dysfunction in multiple European centers. Int J Impot Res. 2023;35:329–31.
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.
Matthew-Onabanjo AN, Matthew AN, Famati E, Nguyen V, Rogers MJ. Perioperative infection prevention during inflatable penile prosthesis surgery: a narrative review. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13:1628–40.
Apoj M, Rodriguez D, Barbosa P, Pan S, Rajender A, Biebel M, et al. Closed suction drain outputs at 12 and 24 h after primary three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2020;32:117–21.
Braun AE, Swerdloff D, Sudhakar A, Patel RD, Gross MS, Simhan J. Defining the incidence and management of postoperative scrotal hematoma after primary and complex three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2025;37:82–6.
Garber BB, Bickell M. Delayed postoperative hematoma formation after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2015;12:265–9.
Rojas-Cruz C, Sarquella J, Vazquez A. Drain cultures in penile prosthesis implants. J Urol. 2009;181:448–448.
Wilson S, Cleves M, Delk JI. Hematoma formation following penile prosthesis implantation: to drain or not to drain. J Urol. 1996;55:634A.
Sadeghi-Nejad H, Ilbeigi P, Wilson SK, Delk JR, Siegel A, Seftel AD, et al. Multi-institutional outcome study on the efficacy of closed-suction drainage of the scrotum in three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis surgery. Int J Impot Res. 2005;17:535–8.
Karpman E, Brant W, Kansas B, Bella A, Christine B, Jones L, et al. Drain use during penile prosthesis surgery, results from the PROPPER Study. J Sex Med. 2018;15:S28.
Meng Y, Song D, Brown S, Vetter J, Bullock A. Prolonged closed suction drains lowered hematoma rates and facilitated early pump operation after inflatable penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2018;15:S224.
Osmonov D, Ragheb AM, Petry T, Eraky A, Bettocchi C, Lamers KG, et al. Value of prolonged scrotal drainage after penile prosthesis implantation: a multicenter prospective nonrandomized pilot study. Int J Impot Res. 2025;37:87–91.
Gupta NK, Ring J, Trost L, Wilson SK, Köhler TS. The penoscrotal surgical approach for inflatable penile prosthesis placement. Transl Androl Urol. 2017;6:628–38.
Swanton A, Munarriz R, Gross M. Updates in penile prosthesis infections. Asian J Androl. 2020;22:28–33.
Funding
Funded by Boston Scientific Corporation United States and Coloplast A/S Denmark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Contributions
KVR: Conceptualization, methodology, supervision, writing – review & editing. HDB: Data curation, formal analysis, methodology, writing – original draft. AY, RC: Conceptualization, writing – original draft. FD, JT, CB, BGG, IM, DR: Conceptualization, supervision, writing – review & editing. MD, CC, WW: Data curation, writing – review & editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Ethical approval was obtained in all participating centers with registration number B24320194051.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Van Renterghem, K., De Bruyn, H., Yebes, A. et al. Early complications after penile prosthesis surgery: findings from the PHOENIX multicenter registry. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01080-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01080-z
