Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Correspondence
  • Published:

Ectopic Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Pump into the Mons Fat Pad for Patients with Difficulty Reaching Their Scrotum: A Case Series

Abstract

Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a well-established treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction. However, patients with a large body habitus often struggle to manipulate a pump placed in the scrotum. Here, we describe a novel technique for placing the IPP pump in the mons fat pad to improve accessibility. This technique follows the traditional approach for cylinder and reservoir placement, but instead creates a subcutaneous pocket in the mons fat pad overlying the inguinal region, where the IPP pump is secured to the dermis to prevent migration. The tubing was tunneled through the initial incision and connected using the traditional approach. Three patients with a mean BMI of 37.0±5.2 underwent this technique at our institution, including one primary implantation and two revisions due to difficulty accessing a scrotal pump. At follow-up ranging from 4 to 16 months, all devices remained functional, and all patients reported easy pump accessibility. No infections, erosions, or other complications were observed. This novel ectopic placement of the IPP pump in the mons fat pad is safe, technically feasible, and offers an alternative for patients with

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Ectopic placement of IPP pump into the mons fat pad.
Fig. 2: Patient manipulation of ectopic IPP pump.

References

  1. Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med. 2007;120:151–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baas W, O’Connor B, Welliver C, Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Wilson SK, et al. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:31–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel J, Zakkar B, Polchert M, Tannenbaum J, Dick B, Raheem O. Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13:165–84.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Eardley I. Malleable vs inflatable implant? which one to choose. J Sex Med. 2017;14:975–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaeer O, Shaeer K, AbdelRahman IF. Simultaneous suprapubic lipectomy and penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1818–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Çayan S, AÅŸcı R, Efesoy O, Bolat MS, Akbay E, Yaman Ă–. Comparison of long-term results and couples’ satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1092–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S, et al. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1180-6.

Download references

Funding

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LL contributed to data curation, investigation, writing-original draft, and writing–review and editing; KO contributed to data curation, writing-original draft, and writing–review and editing; MS contributed to investigation and writing–review and editing; AL contributed to conceptualization, investigation, supervision, and writing–review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lillian Lai.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

The Wayne State Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required for a case series up to three cases. Appropriate consents, permissions, and releases were obtained.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lai, L., O’Hollaren, K., Sessine, M. et al. Ectopic Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Pump into the Mons Fat Pad for Patients with Difficulty Reaching Their Scrotum: A Case Series. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01110-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01110-w

Search

Quick links