Abstract
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a well-established treatment for patients with erectile dysfunction. However, patients with a large body habitus often struggle to manipulate a pump placed in the scrotum. Here, we describe a novel technique for placing the IPP pump in the mons fat pad to improve accessibility. This technique follows the traditional approach for cylinder and reservoir placement, but instead creates a subcutaneous pocket in the mons fat pad overlying the inguinal region, where the IPP pump is secured to the dermis to prevent migration. The tubing was tunneled through the initial incision and connected using the traditional approach. Three patients with a mean BMI of 37.0±5.2 underwent this technique at our institution, including one primary implantation and two revisions due to difficulty accessing a scrotal pump. At follow-up ranging from 4 to 16 months, all devices remained functional, and all patients reported easy pump accessibility. No infections, erosions, or other complications were observed. This novel ectopic placement of the IPP pump in the mons fat pad is safe, technically feasible, and offers an alternative for patients with
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 12 print issues and online access
269,00 € per year
only 22,42 € per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on SpringerLink
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout


References
Selvin E, Burnett AL, Platz EA. Prevalence and risk factors for erectile dysfunction in the US. Am J Med. 2007;120:151–7.
Baas W, O’Connor B, Welliver C, Stahl PJ, Stember DS, Wilson SK, et al. Worldwide trends in penile implantation surgery: data from over 63,000 implants. Transl Androl Urol. 2020;9:31–37.
Patel J, Zakkar B, Polchert M, Tannenbaum J, Dick B, Raheem O. Recent technological development of penile prosthesis: a literature review. Transl Androl Urol. 2024;13:165–84.
Eardley I. Malleable vs inflatable implant? which one to choose. J Sex Med. 2017;14:975–6.
Shaeer O, Shaeer K, AbdelRahman IF. Simultaneous suprapubic lipectomy and penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1818–23.
Çayan S, AÅŸcı R, Efesoy O, Bolat MS, Akbay E, Yaman Ă–. Comparison of long-term results and couples’ satisfaction with penile implant types and brands: lessons learned from 883 patients with erectile dysfunction who underwent penile prosthesis implantation. J Sex Med. 2019;16:1092–9.
Habous M, Tal R, Tealab A, Aziz M, Sherif H, Mahmoud S, et al. Predictors of satisfaction in men after penile implant surgery. J Sex Med. 2018;15:1180-6.
Funding
None
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
LL contributed to data curation, investigation, writing-original draft, and writing–review and editing; KO contributed to data curation, writing-original draft, and writing–review and editing; MS contributed to investigation and writing–review and editing; AL contributed to conceptualization, investigation, supervision, and writing–review and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The Wayne State Research Ethics Committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required for a case series up to three cases. Appropriate consents, permissions, and releases were obtained.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lai, L., O’Hollaren, K., Sessine, M. et al. Ectopic Placement of Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Pump into the Mons Fat Pad for Patients with Difficulty Reaching Their Scrotum: A Case Series. Int J Impot Res (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01110-w
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-025-01110-w