Fig. 2: Magmatic, geochemical, and geophysical constraints on Tibetan Plateau evolution. | Nature Communications

Fig. 2: Magmatic, geochemical, and geophysical constraints on Tibetan Plateau evolution.

From: New constraints on Cenozoic subduction between India and Tibet

Fig. 2

a A sketch of major terrane elements of the Tibet Plateau and Himalayas, with colored patterns representing magmatism4,36,46,54. The dashed blue line marks the model ___location in Fig. 3. b History of Tibetan magmatism along the north-south direction31,38. Distance denotes the distance between the sampling ___location of Moho depth and the suture zone. c, d Crustal thickness evolution of Lhasa and Qiangtang based on magmatic geochemistry79. e Present Tibetan topography (brown) and Moho depth (blue), e.g., along the transect in Panel a4,80,82. Moho depth is from Zhang et al., 2014, which has data coverage over the range of the on-plateau magmatism (also see82). The light green box marks the range of the accreted crust before the indentation of the Indian Subcontinent, e.g., the Tethyan and Greater Himalaya sequences2,5. In panels ce, the smooth-shaded envelopes approximate the overall mean trends of data constraints.

Back to article page