Table 1 Grid-level regression estimates (2016–2019)
From: A human-machine collaborative approach measures economic development using satellite imagery
 | (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Δln(siScore) | Δln(NL) | \({\mathbb{1}}\) {ΔsiScore > 0} | \({\mathbb{1}}\) {ΔNL > 0} | |
Proximity to economic and political hubs | ||||
  Log distance to NK-China and Russia border | 0.089 (0.071) | 0.058a (0.028) | 0.002 (0.031) | −0.055 (0.043) |
  Log distance to Pyongyang | −0.256c (0.069) | 0.175 (0.098) | −0.142c (0.040) | 0.223 (0.147) |
  Log distance to nearest city | −0.105b (0.033) | 0.083b (0.032) | −0.034a (0.017) | −0.090b (0.037) |
  Log distance to nearest major port | 0.132b (0.048) | 0.022 (0.024) | 0.044b (0.015) | −0.018 (0.054) |
Economic Development Zone (EDZ) | ||||
  Agriculture development | 0.243c (0.041) | 0.070 (0.081) | 0.236c (0.022) | 0.307b (0.118) |
  Tourism development | 0.297c (0.083) | 0.391 (0.281) | 0.182c (0.032) | 0.643b (0.198) |
  Industrial development | −0.058 (0.128) | −0.083 (0.165) | −0.005 (0.130) | 0.153a (0.077) |
  Export processing | −0.063 (0.108) | −0.378c (0.047) | −0.038 (0.143) | 0.199 (0.127) |
Mining site of key minerals | ||||
  Gold mine | 0.083b (0.031) | −0.024 (0.028) | 0.005 (0.019) | 0.020 (0.038) |
  Coal mine | 0.074a (0.034) | 0.003 (0.024) | 0.039a (0.022) | 0.117b (0.049) |
  Copper mine | 0.090 (0.050) | 0.076a (0.040) | −0.000 (0.030) | −0.018 (0.049) |
  Iron mine | 0.116 (0.072) | −0.126a (0.059) | 0.113b (0.037) | −0.042 (0.042) |
Nuclear-related site | ||||
  Nuclear test site | −0.033 (0.087) | −0.098a (0.046) | 0.048 (0.047) | −0.011 (0.113) |
  Uranium mine | 0.375b (0.156) | 0.077 (0.072) | 0.197c (0.042) | 0.110 (0.078) |
  Province FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
  Mean of outcome variable | −0.09 | 3.10 | 0.45 | 0.30 |
  Observations | 32,578 | 32,578 | 32,578 | 32,578 |