Fig. 3: Chemical structure and humidity sensing performance comparison. | Nature Communications

Fig. 3: Chemical structure and humidity sensing performance comparison.

From: Smart touchless human–machine interaction based on crystalline porous cages

Fig. 3

The chemical structure of (a) Cage−1, (b) Cage-2, and (c) TA. The humidity sensing properties of (d) Cage-1, (e) Cage-2 and (f) TA with the RH changing from 11% to 95%, respectively. Reproducibility and cycle stability of the (g) Cage-1, (h) Cage-2, and (i) TA over various cycles of humidification (RH 95%) and desiccation (RH 11%).

Back to article page