Correction to: Nature Communications https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49016-3, published online 31 May 2024

The original version of this Article contained an error in Fig. 4, in which the statistical significance for conditions 410C9 versus Lag3−/− in panel 4i was reported as not significant when the association is significant.

The correct version of Fig 4 is:

Which replaces the previous incorrect version:

The original version of this Article contained an error in the figure legend of Fig. 4 describing panels h and i, which incorrectly read ‘Anti-Lag3 410C9 (330 nM) reduced the internalization of α-syn-biotin PFF (1 μM) in WT neurons compared to Lag3–/– neurons. Quantification of the intensity of internalized α-syn-biotin PFF normalized by Rab7. (p-values: WT vs. Lag3−/− < 0.0001, mIgG vs. 410C9 < 0.0001, mIgG vs. Lag3−/− 0.0004, 410C9 vs. Lag3−/− 0.0641)’. The correct version replaces this with ‘Anti-Lag3 410C9 (330 nM) reduced the internalization of α-syn-biotin PFF (1 μM) in WT neurons compared to Lag3–/– neurons. Quantification of the intensity of internalized α-syn-biotin PFF normalized by Rab7. (p-values: WT vs. Lag3−/− < 0.0057, mIgG vs. 410C9 < 0.0277, 410C9 vs. Lag3−/− 0.0152).’

This has been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.