Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

Challenges and promises of big team comparative cognition

Big team science has the potential to reshape comparative cognition research, but its implementation — especially in making fair comparisons between species, handling multisite variation and reaching researcher consensus — poses daunting challenges. Here, we propose solutions and discuss how big team science can transform the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

References

  1. Alessandroni, N. et al. Comp. Cogn. Behav. Rev. 19, 67–72 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Maestripieri, D. Soc. Dev. 14, 181–186 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Farrar, B. G., Voudouris, K. & Clayton, N. S. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 8, 273–295 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Salwiczek, L. H. et al. PLoS One 7, e49068 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Tennie, C., Jensen, K. & Call, J. Nat. Commun. 7, 13915 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Prétôt, L., Bshary, R. & Brosnan, S. F. Anim. Behav. 119, 189–199 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyn, H., Russell, J. L. & Hopkins, W. D. Psychol. Sci. 21, 360–365 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Prétôt, L. et al. Am. J. Primatol. 83, e23212 (2021).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark, H., Elsherif, M. M. & Leavens, D. A. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 105, 178–189 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Talbot, C. F. et al. J. Comp. Psychol. 132, 75–87 (2018).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Morand-Ferron, J., Cole, E. F. & Quinn, J. L. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 91, 367–389 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tamis-LeMonda, C. S. & Masek, L. R. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 32, 369–378 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The ManyBabies Consortium. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 3, 24–52 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. ManyPrimates et al. Anim. Behav. Cogn. 9, 428–516 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chittka, L., Rossiter, S. J., Skorupski, P. & Fernando, C. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 367, 2677–2685 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors of this work are listed alphabetically with the exception of N.A. (first and corresponding author) and L.P. (last author), who coordinated and managed the preparation of the manuscript in their capacity as co-leads of the ManyManys 1 BTS collaboration. The authors are deeply grateful to H. Killam for creating the original version of the image featured in the manuscript. The authors were supported by the following fellowships and grants: FRQSC Postdoctoral Fellowship (B3Z, no. 333109) (N.A.), British Academy PF20\100086 (D.A.), NSF BCS 2127375 (S.F.B.), Open Philanthropy (L.C.), Leverhulme Early-Career Research Fellowship (M.E.), National Science Foundation Award no. 2209046 (J.E.), ERC-2020-ADG, AVIAN MIND, LS5, GA no. 101021354 (O.G.), National Biodiversity Future Center—NBFC, “NextGenerationEU” (Mission 4 Component 2 Investment 1.4—Project code CN_00000033, CUP J83C22000860007) (V.M.), The Sense Innovation and Research Center, Lausanne and Sion (no. CFP2023_WLDC), USB Postdoctoral Fellowship (V.Š.), UDLA Grant 483.A.XIV.24 (J.Y.), NIH NICHD F32HD110174 (M.Z.) and K-INBRE P20 GM103418 (L.P.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolás Alessandroni.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alessandroni, N., Altschul, D., Baumgartner, H.A. et al. Challenges and promises of big team comparative cognition. Nat Hum Behav 9, 240–242 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02081-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02081-6

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Careers

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Careers newsletter — what matters in careers research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Careers