Fig. 2: Singlet–doublet phase transitions.
From: A quantum dot in germanium proximitized by a superconductor

a, Charge stability diagram of VRB versus VPG at VSD = 80 μV, VLB = −1.108 V and VHG = −1.000 V. A cross-capacitance between the electrostatic gate VRB and the QD results in simultaneous tuning of ΓS and ϵ0. We note that we expect the QD system to be in the multi-hole regime. b–d, Bottom panels show bias spectroscopy at decreasing values of VRB corresponding to the square, circle and triangle icons in a. Upper panels portray phase diagrams for the singlet and doublet phases, computed using a minimal ZBW model of the expected ground state character of the hybrid system. Here, ϵ0 is the electrochemical potential of the QD with respect to the grounded SCs, and U is the charging energy of the QD; the phase diagram was computed assuming U = 1.6 meV and Δ = 71 μeV. As the SC–QD coupling ΓS is increased, the doublet state becomes energetically unfavourable, as seen by the merging of charge transitions (magenta dashed lines). ΓS is roughly estimated, by modelling the sub-gap spectrum in the bottom panels (Supplementary Section V), to be 70 μeV, 110 μeV and 150 μeV from b–d, respectively, as indicated by the red dashed lines.