Fig. 5: Measured results showing the efficacy of the hardware-algorithm co-optimization techniques. | Nature

Fig. 5: Measured results showing the efficacy of the hardware-algorithm co-optimization techniques.

From: A compute-in-memory chip based on resistive random-access memory

Fig. 5

a, Simulated (blue) and measured (red) CIFAR-10 test-set classification accuracies. b, CIFAR-10 classification accuracy at various time steps of chip-in-the-loop fine-tuning. From left to right, each data point represents a new layer (Conv0 to Dense) programmed onto the chip. The accuracy at a layer is evaluated by using the hardware-measured outputs from that layer as inputs to the remaining layers that are simulated in software. Two curves compare the test-set inference accuracy with and without applying fine-tuning during training. c, RBM-based image recovery on noisy images (top) and partially occluded images measured on NeuRRAM (bottom).

Back to article page