Extended Data Fig. 7: MYC directly regulates GCDH expression. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 7: MYC directly regulates GCDH expression.

From: Lysine catabolism reprograms tumour immunity through histone crotonylation

Extended Data Fig. 7

a, Diagram depicting the screening strategy to identify enriched TFs with selective dependency in GSCs. b, 12 overlapped TFs responsible for DEGs between GSCs and DGCs/NSCs among the top 20 enriched TFs. c, Top 20 upstream regulators for GCDH transcription, ranked by regulatory potential (RP) score from BETA algorithm. Each dot represents a ChIP-seq sample with analysed TFs labelled on the X axis. TFs with high RP scores are more likely to regulate GCDH. d, Venn diagram showing the overlapped TFs. e, MYC ChIP-seq tracks at GCDH gene locus in 8 human cell lines from ENCODE database. f, The promoter of GCDH harbours a conserved MYC-binding element. g,h, Correlation between GCDH and MYC mRNA (g) or signature (h). i–k, RT-qPCR (i,k) and IB (j) analysis of steady-state mRNA, nascent transcripts or protein of GCDH in GSCs with or without MYC inhibition. NRO, nuclear run-on. l, Cell proliferation of GSC23 cultured in indicated media and treated with or without 0.2 µM MYCi975 for 5 days. m, Lysine levels in serum and brain tissues from healthy NSG mice or NSG mice bearing GSC23-derived intracranial tumours after dietary lysine restriction for 4 weeks (n = 4 biologically independent mice). n, Intracellular lysine levels of GSC23 cultured in indicated media for 5 days. o, Flow cytometry plots and quantification (n = 4 biologically independent mice) of protein synthesis rate in CD147+ human tumour cells as indicated. p, IF staining of indicated sections from GSC23-derived intracranial tumours (n = 3 biologically independent mice). N, non-tumour; T, tumour. Scale bar, 20 µm. Data are presented from three independent experiments in i,k,l and n. Representative of two independent experiments in j. Data are presented as mean ± SEM in i and k–o. Pearson’s correlation with two-tailed test for g and h, one-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons with adjusted p values for i,m and n, two-tailed unpaired t test for k and o, two-way ANOVA followed by multiple comparisons with adjusted p values for l. ns, not significant.

Source data

Back to article page