Extended Data Fig. 9: Characterizations of intermediates during cycling to diagnose the S9.3I cathode working mechanism.
From: Healable and conductive sulfur iodide for solid-state Li–S batteries

(a) The corresponding ratios of S0, Sb, St, and S2- in the S9.3I cathode in Fig. 3b at different discharge/charge states. (b) Ex situ Raman spectra of S9.3I during the discharge/charge processes. The ex situ Raman spectra suggest the good reversibility of S9.3I cathode at RT. X-band EPR spectra obtained on (c) the pristine S9.3I cathode, and on (d) the SSE and carbon mixture (LPS-VGCF). (e) Ex situ EPR data obtained on cathode samples harvested from cells stopped at various stages of the initial discharge/charge processes. (f) Parameters obtained from fits of the EPR spectra in (e), including the ratios of the signal intensities from the S9.3I cathode material and from the VGCF additive, and the linewidth of the S9.3I EPR signal. The ratio of S9.3I radicals to carbon decreases during initial discharge and grows upon subsequent charge (f). This trend is consistent with the following model, assuming that polysulfide chains that form in the solid-state exist as dianions and cannot be detected in our EPR measurements, unlike EPR-active polysulfide radicals formed in solution through disproportionation of polysulfide dianions (as in conventional Li-S cells). (g) The S2p high resolution XPS of comparison samples, including LPS/VGCF mixture, S cathode discharge to 1.3 V (D-1.3 V) and chemically lithiated S9.3I prepared by reacting with Li powder with an equivalent capacity of ~800 mAh g−1. (h) Digital photos of elemental S cathode discharged to 1.3 V, S9.3I cathode discharged to 1.3 V, chemically lithiated S9.3I immersed in THF solution and standard Li2S4, Li2S6 THF solutions. (i) The UV-Vis spectra of corresponding samples in (h). The S9.3I cathode discharged to 1.3 V and chemically lithiated S9.3I suspensions exhibit the color of LiSx solutions immediately, but elemental S cathode discharged to 1.3 V doesn’t show any change.