Extended Data Fig. 4: Comparison between the relative risk of observing identical sequences and the relative risk of movement at the county level.
From: Fine-scale patterns of SARS-CoV-2 spread from identical pathogen sequences
A. Relationship between the relative risk of observing identical sequences in two counties and the relative risk of movement between these counties as obtained from mobile phone mobility data. B. Scaled Pearson residuals of the GAM plotted in A as a function of the number of pairs of identical sequences observed in pairs of counties. C. Relationship between the relative risk of observing identical sequences in two counties and the relative risk of movement between these counties as obtained from workflow mobility data. D. Scaled Pearson residuals of the GAM plotted in C as a function of the number of pairs of identical sequences observed in pairs of counties. E. Relationship between the relative risk of observing identical sequences in two counties and the Euclidean distance between counties centroids. F. Scaled Pearson residuals of the GAM plotted in E as a function of the number of pairs of identical sequences observed in pairs of counties. In B, D and F, we label pairs of non-adjacent counties sharing at least 100 pairs of identical sequences and for which the absolute value of the Scaled Pearson residual is greater than 3. The trend lines correspond to predicted relative risk of observing identical sequences in two regions from each GAM. R2 indicate the variance explained by each GAM.
