Table 4 Comparative analysis diagram of different articles’ genomes.

From: Genomics and transcriptomics of the Chinese mitten crabs (Eriocheir sinensis)

Item

OE assembly

Cui et al., 2021

Tang et al., 2020

Jun Wang et al., 2022

Contig

18,472

1,70,724

6,666

4,808

Contig

1,59,228

26,045

27,47,658

7,17,335

Longest Contig(bp)

30,61,231

14,57,336

1,50,47,233

45,379, 147

Scaffold No.

6,908

1,01,205

4,311

2, 160

Scaffold N50 (bp)

17,444, 176

17, 127,685

1,76,08,299

1,69,75,517

Longest Scaffold(bp)

4,16,92,756

5,08,64,308

3,14,80,327

45,379, 147

BUSCO(%)

96

86

86

95

Gene No.

30, 188

28,033

22,619

20,286

Protein No.

30,661

28,033

22,619

20,286

Repeat (%)

50

45

61

60

Chromoso me No.

71

73

72

70

Total length(bp)

1,26,60,92,319

1,56,76,15,418

1,272, 135, 1

17,67,84,644

Sequencing Data

Illumina(PE150,262 G)

PacBio Sequel II(113 G)

Hi-C(288 G)

Illumina(PE + MP,374 G)

PacBio Sequel II(51 G)

Hi-C(132 G)

10xGenomics(PE150,154 G)

Illumina(96 G from Song et al., 2016)

Oxford

Nanopore(53 G)

Illumina(81.2 G)

Oxford Nanopore(81.7 G)

BioNano(442.0 G)

Hi-C(300.5 G)