Table 1 Comparison of CM, SAM, and 3DSM.
Method | CM | SAM | 3DSM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Dish/Bottle size | 10 cm-dish | 10 cm-dish | 60 ml in 1 × 100 ml SF | 800 ml in 1 × 1000 ml SF |
Yield ( × 106) | 3.5–5 | 4.5–6 |  > 70 |  > 900 |
Cost | High | High | Low | Low |
SPT (hours) | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
Manipulation | Inflexible | Flexible | Flexible | Flexible |
Workload | Heavy | Heavy | Light | Light |
DAR | 70–85% | 96% | 90–96% | 90–96% |
RR | 70–73% | 85–92% | 83–90% | 83–90% |
ST (days) |  <7 |  >7 |  >7 |  > 7 |
