Table 1 Inclusion criteria of the systematic review and meta-analysis.

From: Intrafascial versus interfascial nerve sparing in radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Criteria

Description

Patients

Adult men who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

Intervention

ITR-NS, which was defined as the preservation of the periprostatic fascia and nerves by cutting adjacent prostate and dissecting the plane between prostatic capsule and prostatic fascia

Comparison

ITE-NS was the control group, which was defined as the dissection of the plane between prostatic fascia and endopelvic fascia; studies were not be selected or excluded based on surgical approaches (i.e. retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches)

Primary outcomes

Functional and oncologic results. The functional results included postoperative urinary continence rate and potency recovery rate, and the oncologic results included PSM, pT2 PSM, and BCR free rates

Secondary outcomes

Perioperative parameters (i.e. operative time, blood loss, transfusion rates, duration of catheterization, and hospital stay)

Study design

RCTs or longitudinal controlled studies were included (i.e. RCTs, prospective or retrospective cohort comparative studies)

  1. PSM = positive surgical margin; BCR = biochemical recurrence; RCTs = randomized controlled trials.