Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-33241-0, published online 05 October 2018

The original version of this Article contained typographical errors in the Abstract.

“Values of LOEC, IC50 and pLC50 obtained for IVM and MOX evaluated in an environmental context indicate that MOX, despite needing more time for tis elimination in the faeces, would be twice as harmful to dung beetles as IVM.”

now reads:

“Values of LOEC, IC50 and pLC50 obtained for IVM and MOX evaluated in an environmental context indicate that MOX, despite needing more time for its elimination in the faeces, would be half as harmful to dung beetles as IVM.”

Furthermore, in the second paragraph of the Discussion section:

“Thus, from an environmental point of view, obtained LOEC values indicate that MOX, despite needing more time for its elimination in the faeces could be twice as harmful to dung beetles as IVM.”

now reads:

“Thus, from an environmental point of view, obtained LOEC values indicate that MOX, despite needing more time for its elimination in the faeces could be half as harmful to dung beetles as IVM.”

These errors have now been corrected in the PDF and HTML versions of the Article.