Table 1 CAGE overlap and coding prediction of the novel transcripts break down into the eight categories.

From: Long read, isoform aware sequencing of mouse nucleus accumbens after chronic cocaine treatment

 

NO CAGE overlap

CAGE overlap

 

Coding

Non-coding

Coding

Non-coding

Antisense

10.6% (10)

20.2% (19)

18.1% (17)

51.1% (48)

Intergenic

1.1% (1)

52.7% (48)

3.3% (3)

42.9% (39)

Fusion

5% (14)

2.5% (7)

84.4% (238)

8.2% (23)

Genic

7.7% (3)

15.4% (6)

41% (16)

35.9% (14)

FSM

3% (551)

1.2% (217)

92% (17,175)

3.9% (728)

ISM

19.9% (724)

1.3% (48)

76% (2768)

2.7% (100)

NIC

3% (350)

0.2% (23)

95.2% (10,923)

1.6% (182)

NNIC

6.2% (488)

1% (81)

88.7% (6934)

4% (310)

  1. For each row, the proportions and the corresponding counts of each category are shown.
Back to article page