Table 4 Robustness test results.
Variable | Eliminate central cities | Replace dependent variable | One installment in advance |
---|---|---|---|
DID | 0.183* | 0.165** | Â |
(1.89) | (2.47) | Â | |
Advanced_ did | Â | Â | 0.130 |
 |  | (1.60) | |
Size | 0.550*** | 0.364*** | 0.448*** |
(10.87) | (12.16) | (12.01) | |
Age | − 0.672*** | − 0.519*** | − 0.783*** |
(− 4.51) | (− 5.33) | (− 6.54) | |
Lev | − 0.00747*** | − 0.00485*** | − 0.00826*** |
(− 2.82) | (− 3.09) | (− 4.08) | |
Sub | − 0.0793** | 0.0126 | − 0.0268 |
(− 2.33) | (0.58) | (− 1.01) | |
Growth | 0.00246 | 0.00452 | − 0.00476 |
(0.12) | (0.38) | (− 0.31) | |
Roa | 0.425 | 0.704** | 0.807* |
(0.85) | (2.13) | (1.93) | |
Cashflow | 0.224 | 0.0733 | 0.0564 |
(1.36) | (0.86) | (0.49) | |
_ cons | 2.596*** | 0.478 | 2.596*** |
(3.60) | (0.97) | (4.53) | |
Industry | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Year | Yes | Yes | Yes |
N | 8880 | 16,160 | 16,160 |
r2 | 0.443 | 0.396 | 0.450 |