Figure 4 | Scientific Reports

Figure 4

From: Comparing extraction method efficiency for high-throughput palaeoproteomic bone species identification

Figure 4

Compatibility of species identification in the “specific” MaxQuant search per specimen for each protein extraction approach; 1-Acid, 2-AmBic, 3b-EDTA LysC Neutral, 4a-EDTA Protease Mix Acidic, 4b-EDTA Protease Mix Neutral, 5b-EDTA + GuHCl Neutral, 6-SPIN. “Unassigned” specimens did not generate reliable results for species identification compared to their previous taxonomic identities. Of the 12 analyzed specimens in this study, specimens “GdC_7”, “GdC_26” and “GdC_193” were excluded from this table because there was no precise species identification assigned previously. “Ra_10300″ was also excluded from the table because no member of the Rhinocerotidae family is included in the Rüther et al. 20223 reference protein sequence database. Extraction methods 3a-EDTA LysC Acidic and 5a-EDTA + GuHCl Acidic were excluded from the study as no reliable MS spectra were generated.

Back to article page