Table 2 HPLC-based method validation data for CS leaf extracts and marker compounds.
From: Chemoprofiling and medicinal potential of underutilized leaves of Cyperus scariosus
Compound | λmax (nm) | Linearity Equation | Determination Coefficient (R2) | Linearity range (ng/µL) | LOD (ng/µL) | LOQ (ng/µL) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linearity and sensitivity | ||||||
 Caffeic acid | 326 | y = 61.84x − 27.62 | 0.9998 | 1–60 | 0.32 | 0.98 |
 Catechin | 280 | y = 5.23x − 3.73 | 0.9998 | 5–60 | 1.63 | 4.95 |
 Epicatechin | 280 | y = 4.61x − 3.84 | 0.9997 | 5–60 | 1.64 | 4.97 |
 Trans-p-coumaric acid | 326 | y = 63.20x − 27.91 | 0.9998 | 1–60 | 0.30 | 0.91 |
 Trans-ferulic acid | 326 | y = 60.17x − 25.69 | 0.9998 | 1–60 | 0.33 | 0.99 |
Compound | Amount (ng/µL) | Precision (% RSD) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intra-day (n = 3) | Inter-day (n = 3) |  | ||||
RT (min) | Peak area | RT (min) | Peak area | |||
Precision | ||||||
 Caffeic acid | 10 | 0.14 | 0.29 | 0.70 | 2.31 |  |
20 | 0.03 | 0.75 | 0.69 | 1.22 | Â | |
40 | 0.14 | 0.62 | 0.52 | 0.24 | Â | |
 Catechin | 10 | 0.17 | 1.76 | 1.09 | 2.26 |  |
20 | 0.04 | 1.74 | 1.08 | 2.40 | Â | |
40 | 0.18 | 0.42 | 0.84 | 0.32 | Â | |
 Epicatechin | 10 | 0.15 | 1.71 | 0.85 | 2.16 |  |
20 | 0.02 | 1.33 | 0.86 | 2.04 | Â | |
40 | 0.09 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 1.01 | Â | |
 Trans-p-coumaric acid | 10 | 0.14 | 0.26 | 0.53 | 1.48 |  |
20 | 0.02 | 0.68 | 0.52 | 0.80 | Â | |
40 | 0.06 | 0.67 | 0.39 | 0.21 | Â | |
 Trans-ferulic acid | 10 | 0.08 | 0.22 | 0.35 | 1.36 |  |
20 | 0.02 | 0.48 | 0.22 | 0.15 | Â | |
40 | 0.09 | 0.61 | 0.27 | 0.44 | Â |
Compound | % Recovery | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Spike level-1 | Spike level-2 | Spike level-3 | Â | |||
Accuracy | Â | |||||
 Caffeic acid | 104.32 | 106.51 | 103.48 |  |  |  |
 Catechin | 96.21 | 99.63 | 97.52 |  |  |  |
 Epicatechin | 98.73 | 96.86 | 94.37 |  |  |  |
 Trans-p-coumaric acid | 103.26 | 104.27 | 106.77 |  |  |  |
 Trans-ferulic acid | 104.75 | 102.83 | 103.28 |  |  |  |