Table 3 The comparison and evaluation of TG hydrogel/SF/Fe3O4 nanocomposite with other reported.
Entry | Natural polymer | Nanocomposite | MTT(%) | Hemolysis (%) | Time (h) | Ref |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | TG | EC-loaded nanogel | 81 | – | 72 | |
2 | TG | TG-g-PNIPAAm/Fe3O4 | 93 | – | 24 | |
3 | TG | FSRMH | 93.6 | ~ 2.4 | 24 | |
4 | TG | TG-co-SA-cl-PVA | – | ~ 0.83 | 24 | |
5 | TG | GT-GO5 | ~ 90 | – | 72 | |
6 | TG | Hydrogels 1 and 2 | ~ 93 | – | 24 | |
7 | TG | TG-g-PANI)S3) | 121.6 | < 2 | 72 | |
8 | TG | TG hydrogel/SF/Fe3O4 | 95.53 | No hemolytic effect | 72 | This work |
