Table 4 The DNN model performance was completely evaluated using different techniques for sequence formulation.
Methods | Acc% | Sn% | Sp% | F1 score | MCC |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kmer | 65.13 | 71.34 | 63.23 | 52.14 | 0.303 |
RC-Kmer | 67.34 | 65.43 | 70.65 | 53.78 | 0.294 |
PseDNC | 68.09 | 67.32 | 69.33 | 55.21 | 0.353 |
PseTNC | 70.94 | 80.79 | 69.84 | 70.03 | 0.378 |
TAC | 68.95 | 79.65 | 67.83 | 69.08 | 0.344 |
TCC | 66.32 | 69.54 | 73.43 | 59.92 | 0.312 |
DCC | 67.87 | 74.23 | 63.67 | 63.80 | 0.324 |
Hybrid feature (without feature selection) | 76.87 | 75.75 | 84.86 | 76.29 | 0.584 |
Hybrid feature (with feature selection) | 84.07 | 90.29 | 83.07 | 84.64 | 0.736 |