Table 3 Comparison with the Baseline and State-of-the-Art Methods for EEG200. * means the method is reproduced and reported by CAW-MASA-STST6, and # means the method is reproduced by LMDA36 and is tested in our environment.

From: A hybrid local-global neural network for visual classification using raw EEG signals

Method

Accuracy (%)

2-class

10-class

Linear

64.84 ± 0.37

24.28 ± 0.31

CNN

60.50 ± 0.26

18.95 ± 0.21

LSTM

64.33 ± 0.35

23.15 ± 0.12

Transformer

61.70 ± 0.28

22.89 ± 0.22

EEGNet#

63.30 ± 0.40

22.63 ± 0.25

ShallowConvNet#

61.01 ± 0.45

20.61 ± 0.23

LDA13

56.14

14.40

LSTM-CNN*

64.85

24.76

ShallowConvNet*

65.53

25.13

CAW-MASA-STST6

68.33

31.37

Ours

69.08 ± 0.45

29.39 ± 0.19