Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-91787-2, published online 10 March 2025
The original version of this Article contained a repeated error, where Reference 18 was incorrectly cited.
As a result, in the Methods section, under the subheading ‘Patients’,
“The qSOFA score criteria are as follows: (1) systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg; (2) respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths per minute; (3) altered mental status, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13, where each assessment criterion is assigned a score of 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 318.”
now reads:
“The qSOFA score criteria are as follows: (1) systolic blood pressure ≤ 100 mmHg; (2) respiratory rate ≥ 22 breaths per minute; (3) altered mental status, with a Glasgow Coma Scale score < 13, where each assessment criterion is assigned a score of 1, and the total score ranges from 0 to 38.”
Also, in the Discussion section,
“Compared to SIRS criteria, the SOFA and qSOFA scores according to the Sepsis-3 guidelines have been proven to have higher sensitivity and specificity, better predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis18.”
now reads:
“Compared to SIRS criteria, the SOFA and qSOFA scores according to the Sepsis-3 guidelines have been proven to have higher sensitivity and specificity, better predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis8.”
Consequently, References have been renumbered accordingly.
The original Article has been corrected.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Gao, C., Liu, J., Wang, D. et al. Author Correction: Risk factors and an optimized prediction model for urosepsis in diabetic patients with upper urinary tract stones. Sci Rep 15, 16562 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00676-1
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-00676-1