Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-87545-z, published online 29 January 2025

The original version of this Article contained errors in Tables 3-5. In all affected tables, instances of "P > 1" were erroneously reported. Rigorous re-examination of raw data and recalculation confirms the values should be "P > 0.999". This discrepancy originated from an inadvertent rounding convention during data processing. These revisions reflect recalibrated computational accuracy following verification against source datasets.

Additionally, there was an error in the proportional data adjustment in Table 3,

“18/26 (76.5%)”

now reads:

“18/26 (69.2%)”

And

“16/24 (70.6%)”

now reads:

“16/24 (66.7%)”

The original Article has been corrected.