Table 1 Overview of a variety of nano additives and their influence on characteristics of engine.

From: Performance and emission prediction using ANN (artificial neural network) on H2-assisted Garcinia gummi-gutta biofuel doped with nano additives

Researcher

Nano additive and surfactant concentration

Base fuel and surfactant

Engine specification

Significance

Sivakumar et al.68

Al2O3 (50–100 ppm), Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

Palm oil methyl ester

Single cylinder, 4 S, Kirloskar AV1, 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 16.5:1 CR, 1500 rpm

7% high BTE, lowered BSFC, HC, CO, higher NOx emissions

Ranjan et al.69

MgO (30 ppm), 4-Chlorobenzoyl chloride

Waste cooking oil biodiesel

Single cylinder, Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500 rpm, 17:1 CR, load (4.7–18.11 kg)

Higher BP, BSFC and BTE, CO2,Lowered HC, CO and NOx, Improved combustion

Mehregan et al.70

Manganese oxide and cobalt oxide (25 ppm and 50 ppm), no surfactant

B20 waste frying oil

4 Cylinder, 4Stroke Urea-SCR Direct Injection, CR 17.9: 1, IP210 bar, IT 23 deg bTDC

Lowered SFC at part and full load, higher thermal η, drastic reduction of NOx and CO

El-Seesy et al.71

Al2O3 (50–100 ppm), 20 mg per lit., no surfactant

Jojoba oil methyl ester

Deutz F1l511, 1 cyl, 4 S, DI, 1500 rpm, IP175 bar, IT 24 deg bTDC

NOx 70%↓, CO 80%↓, HC 60%↓, and Smoke 35%↓, 12% drop in BSFC

Hoseini et al.72

Graphene oxide (30,60 and 90ppm), no surfactant

Ailanthus altissima biodiesel

LombardiniDiesel3LD510, 1800 rpm, 17.9:1 CR, 1 cyl, non-turbocharged, 32.8Nm torque

↓HC, ↓CO, ↓BSFC, ↑NOx and ↑CO

Kumar et al.73

Ferrous oxide and ferrofluid (0.5%, 1% and 1.5%), surfactant: 2 mol of NaOH

B20 palm oil methyl ester

Single cylinder, 4 S, Kirloskar TV1, 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 16.5:1 CR, 1500 rpm

↑ BTE (by 16.6%), ↓BSFC (by 11.1%), other emissions reduced simultaneously

Ashok et al.74

Zinc oxide (50 and 100ppm), Ethanox (200 and 500 ppm) Surfactant: Alcohol

CalophyllumInophyllum methyl ester

Simpson S217, Two cyl 4 S, DI, Vertical, IT 23 deg bTDC, IP 200 bar 18.5:1 CR

High BTE for ZnO (29.5%) than Ethanox (26.8%), lowest BSFC for ZnO50 ppm, 18.4% and 13% less CO and HC for ZnO 50 ppm, 17.8% less NOx for Ethanox (500 ppm), 12.6% less NOx for ZnO100 ppm.

Leo et al.75

Al2O3and FeCl3 (50 and 100 ppm), no surfactant

Waste cooking oil biodiesel (WCOB)

Homogeneous CCI-DI , 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 17.5:1 CR, 1500 rpm, 4.4 kW

HC reduced by 54.17%, NOx reduced by 4.3%, 100ppm additive lowers 30.4% smoke in diesel, 23.65% in WCOP

Mohanraju et al.76

Aluminium nitrate (Al (NO3)3) nanoparticles and graphene oxide nanoplates (GONPS)  50 ppm, no surfactant

Industrial leather waste fat biodiesel

Single cylinder, Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500 rpm, 17:1 CR, load (4.7–18.11 kg)

CO2↓6.84%, HC↓13.11%,, and smoke ↓5.75 emissions for Al (NO3)3) nano particles

Jayabal et al.77

Bio-silica (Bio-Si) 50-100 ppm, no surfactant

Leather waste fat biodiesel

Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500 rpm, 17:1 CR, 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT

Higher BTE and lowered NOx for 50 ppm additive fuel. For 100ppm additive, HC and CO reduced by 31.87% and 34.14%, but NOx increased by 4.45%.