Table 1 Overview of a variety of nano additives and their influence on characteristics of engine.
Researcher | Nano additive and surfactant concentration | Base fuel and surfactant | Engine specification | Significance |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sivakumar et al.68 | Al2O3 (50–100 ppm), Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide | Palm oil methyl ester | Single cylinder, 4 S, Kirloskar AV1, 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 16.5:1 CR, 1500 rpm | 7% high BTE, lowered BSFC, HC, CO, higher NOx emissions |
Ranjan et al.69 | MgO (30 ppm), 4-Chlorobenzoyl chloride | Waste cooking oil biodiesel | Single cylinder, Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500 rpm, 17:1 CR, load (4.7–18.11 kg) | Higher BP, BSFC and BTE, CO2,Lowered HC, CO and NOx, Improved combustion |
Mehregan et al.70 | Manganese oxide and cobalt oxide (25 ppm and 50 ppm), no surfactant | B20 waste frying oil | 4 Cylinder, 4Stroke Urea-SCR Direct Injection, CR 17.9: 1, IP210 bar, IT 23 deg bTDC | Lowered SFC at part and full load, higher thermal η, drastic reduction of NOx and CO |
El-Seesy et al.71 | Al2O3 (50–100 ppm), 20 mg per lit., no surfactant | Jojoba oil methyl ester | Deutz F1l511, 1 cyl, 4 S, DI, 1500 rpm, IP175 bar, IT 24 deg bTDC | NOx 70%↓, CO 80%↓, HC 60%↓, and Smoke 35%↓, 12% drop in BSFC |
Hoseini et al.72 | Graphene oxide (30,60 and 90ppm), no surfactant | Ailanthus altissima biodiesel | LombardiniDiesel3LD510, 1800 rpm, 17.9:1 CR, 1 cyl, non-turbocharged, 32.8Nm torque | ↓HC, ↓CO, ↓BSFC, ↑NOx and ↑CO |
Kumar et al.73 | Ferrous oxide and ferrofluid (0.5%, 1% and 1.5%), surfactant: 2 mol of NaOH | B20 palm oil methyl ester | Single cylinder, 4 S, Kirloskar TV1, 210 bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 16.5:1 CR, 1500 rpm | ↑ BTE (by 16.6%), ↓BSFC (by 11.1%), other emissions reduced simultaneously |
Ashok et al.74 | Zinc oxide (50 and 100ppm), Ethanox (200 and 500 ppm) Surfactant: Alcohol | CalophyllumInophyllum methyl ester | Simpson S217, Two cyl 4Â S, DI, Vertical, IT 23Â deg bTDC, IP 200Â bar 18.5:1 CR | High BTE for ZnO (29.5%) than Ethanox (26.8%), lowest BSFC for ZnO50 ppm, 18.4% and 13% less CO and HC for ZnO 50 ppm, 17.8% less NOx for Ethanox (500 ppm), 12.6% less NOx for ZnO100 ppm. |
Leo et al.75 | Al2O3and FeCl3 (50 and 100 ppm), no surfactant | Waste cooking oil biodiesel (WCOB) | Homogeneous CCI-DIÂ , 210Â bar IP and 23degbTDC IT, 17.5:1 CR, 1500Â rpm, 4.4Â kW | HC reduced by 54.17%, NOx reduced by 4.3%, 100ppm additive lowers 30.4% smoke in diesel, 23.65% in WCOP |
Mohanraju et al.76 | Aluminium nitrate (Al (NO3)3) nanoparticles and graphene oxide nanoplates (GONPS) 50 ppm, no surfactant | Industrial leather waste fat biodiesel | Single cylinder, Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500 rpm, 17:1 CR, load (4.7–18.11 kg) | CO2↓6.84%, HC↓13.11%,, and smoke ↓5.75 emissions for Al (NO3)3) nano particles |
Jayabal et al.77 | Bio-silica (Bio-Si) 50-100Â ppm, no surfactant | Leather waste fat biodiesel | Kirloskar TV1, vertical, 1500Â rpm, 17:1 CR, 210Â bar IP and 23degbTDC IT | Higher BTE and lowered NOx for 50 ppm additive fuel. For 100ppm additive, HC and CO reduced by 31.87% and 34.14%, but NOx increased by 4.45%. |