Table 1 Overview of studies included in the systematic review.

From: Fusion of medical imaging and electronic health records using deep learning: a systematic review and implementation guidelines

Fusion strategy

Year

Author

Clinical ___domain

Outcome

Fusion details

Input: medical imaging

Input: non-imaging data

Number of samples

Model performance

Early

2017

Thung et al.25

Neurology

Diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease

Software or manually extracted features

PET, MRI

Patient data (age, sex, education)

Genetic data (APOE4)

805

Fusion: 63.6% Accuracy

MRI + PET: 61.1% Accuracy

MRI: 58.0% Accuracy

Early

2018

An et al.35

Ophthalmology

Glaucoma classification

Software or manually extracted features

Optical coherence tomography,

Laser speckle flowgraphy

Patient data (age, sex, spherical equivalent)

163

Fusion: 87.8% Accuracy

Early (multi-stage)

2018

Bhagwat et al.33

Neurology

Prediction of clinical symptom trajectories in Alzheimer’s disease

Software or manually extracted features

MRI

Patient data (age, clinical scores)

Genetic data (APOE4)

1302

Fusion: 0.99 AUROC

MRI: 0.83 AUROC

Clinical Attributes: 0.97 AUROC

Early

2018

Kharazmi et al.26

Dermatology

Basal cell carcinoma detection

CNN extracted features

Dermoscopic images

Patient data (age, sex, elevation, lesion ___location, lesion size)

1191

Fusion: 91.1% Accuracy

Dermoscopic Images: 84.7% Accuracy

Patient Profile: 75.6% Accuracy

Early

2018

Liu et al.34

Neurology

Prediction of rupture risk in anterior communicating artery aneurysms

Software or manually extracted features

CT

Patient data (age, sex, hypertension, smoking habits)

594

Fusion: 0.928 AUROC

Early

2018

Liu et al.30

Radiology

Bone age assessment

CNN extracted features

X-ray

Patient data (age, sex)

11,858

Fusion: 0.455 Mean Absolute Error

Early

2018

Yap et al.27

Dermatology

Classification of skin lesion and

detection of melanoma

CNN extracted features

Macroscopic images,

Dermoscopic images

Patient data (age, sex, body ___location)

2917

Fusion: 0.888 AUROC

Macroscopic + Dermoscopic Images: 0.888 AUROC

Patient metadata: 0.810 AUROC

Early

2019

Hyun et al.32

Radiology/Oncology

Lung cancer

Software or manually extracted features

PET/CT

Patient data (age, sex, tumor size, smoking status)

396

Fusion: 0.859 AUROC

Early

2019

Li et al.28

Neurology

Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease

CNN extracted features

MRI

Assessments (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive subscale, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Functional Assessment Questionnaire, and Mini-Mental State Examination)

Patient data (age, gender, education, APOE4)

822

Fusion: 0.901 C-index

Cognitive data: 0.896 C-index

Early

2019

Nie et al.31

Radiology/Oncology

Prediction of survival time for brain tumor patients

CNN extracted features

MRI

Patient data (age, tumor size, histological type)

93

Fusion: 90.66% Accuracy

MRI: 81.04% Accuracy

Demographics and tumor features: 62.96% Accuracy

Early

2020

Purwar et al.29

Hematology

Detection of microcytic hypochromia

CNN extracted features

Images of Red Blood Cells

Blood test (complete blood count, haematocrit, HCT, MCV, MCH, MCHC, RDW, hemoglobin A1 hemoglobin A2, hemoglobin F, Mentzer index)

20

Fusion: 1.00 AUROC

Images: 0.88 AUROC

Blood count features: 0.93 AUROC

Joint*

2018

Kawahara et al.39

Dermatology

Melanoma classification and

binary classification of each of the seven-point checklist for melanoma

Multimodal multi-task

Dermoscopic Images,

Clinical Images

Patient data (sex, lesion ___location)

1011

Fusion: 73.7% Accuracy

Dermoscopic Images: 72.5% Accuracy

Clinical Images: 64.1% Accuracy

Joint

2018

Spasov et al.36

Neurology

Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease

–

MRI

Patient data (age, sex, race, education, biofluids)

Genetic data (APOE4)

Assessments (Clinical Dementia rating [CSRSB], Alzheimer’s disease assessment scale, Rey auditory verbal learning test)

376

Fusion: 1.00 AUROC

Joint

2019

Yala et al.37

Radiology/Oncology

Breast cancer risk prediction

–

Mammograms

Patent data (age, weight, height, menarche

age, menopausal status, detailed family history of breast and

ovarian cancer, BRCA mutation status, history of atypical

hyperplasia, history of lobular carcinoma in situ, and breast

density)

88,994

Fusion: 0.70 AUROC

Mammograms: 0.68 AUROC

Risk scores: 0.67 AUROC

Joint

Late

2019

Yoo et al.38

Neurology

Predicting status conversion to multiple sclerosis within two years

CNN extracted feature

Averaging (Late)

MRI

Patient data (sex, extended disability status scale, uni- vs. multifocal clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) at onset, ___location of initial CIS event)

140

Joint Fusion: 0.746 AUROC

Late Fusion: 0.724 AUROC

MRI: 0.718 AUROC

Clinical Features: 0.679 AUROC

Late

2018

Qiu et al.41

Neurology

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI)

Majority voting

MRI

Assessments (Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory (LM) test)

386

Fusion: 90.9% Accuracy

MRI: 83.1% Accuracy

MMSE: 84.3% Accuracy

LM: 89.1% Accuracy

Late

2018

Reda et al.40

Radiology/Oncology

Prostate cancer diagnosis

Meta classifier

MRI

PSA blood test

18

Fusion: 94.4% Accuracy

MRI: 88.89% Accuracy

PSA: 77.78% Accuracy

  1. The table provides an overview of all studies included in the systematic review including fusion strategy and data extracted from each study.