Table 1 Periods of change in trends of forest losses according to literature and differences from our market-driven counterfactual simulations

From: Trends in tropical forest loss and the social value of emission reductions

Factor #

Documented periods with domestic policies or other impacts on the level of forest loss

Forest cover losses (in million hectares) and emissions (gigatonnes CO2) (in brackets)

Source and reason

Country

Period (yr)

Type of forest loss phase

(1) Observed forest losses

(2) Market-driven (counterfactual) forest losses

(1)−(2) Residual: non-market-driven forest losses

1

Ref. 51 - Command-and-control: agreements with meat companies and soy moratorium

Brazil

2004–2012

Reduction

24.630 (9.31)

31.285 (11.83)

−6.655 (−2.52)

2

Ref. 20 - Climate phenomenon El Niño

Brazil

2015–2017

Excess

12.120 (4.58)

8.909 (3.37)

+3.211 (+1.21)

3

Ref. 18 - Armed conflicts

DR Congo

2012–2019

Excess

9.260 (3.84)

5.467 (2.27)

+3.793 (+1.57)

4

Ref. 64 - Command-and-control: consistent permitting rules and export taxes

Indonesia

2000–2005

Reduction

5.314 (2.93)

9.724 (5.35)

−4.410 (−2.43)

5

Ref. 17 - Public spending (additional harvesting allowances) before elections

Indonesia

2010–2019

Excess

15.980 (8.80)

11.697 (6.44)

+4.283 (+2.36)

Sum

67.304 (29.46)

67.082 (29.26)

+0.222 (+0.20)

  1. Counterfactual simulations are shown in Fig. 4. We excluded the model calibration phase (1990–1999) from this table (see Supplementary Methods 1).