Fig. 2: Comparison of outcomes according to intensity of conditioning in high- and low-benefit groups. | Communications Medicine

Fig. 2: Comparison of outcomes according to intensity of conditioning in high- and low-benefit groups.

From: Machine learning evaluation of intensified conditioning on haematopoietic stem cell transplantation in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia patients

Fig. 2

a Overall survival (OS). b Disease-free survival (DFS). c Cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM). d Cumulative incidence of relapse. The percent values in the figure represent the data at 24 months after transplantation. Shadings represent 95% confidence intervals. Hazard ratios (HRs) and p values were calculated using the Cox proportional hazards model (a, b) and Fine & Gray’s tests (c, d).* indicates p < 0.05.

Back to article page