here is the google result.... Nothing like what you said.

本帖于 2025-06-27 11:32:01 时间, 由普通用户 Uusequery 编辑
回答: Google大洋bridge2025-06-27 11:24:51

To compare the trustworthiness of U.S. car dealers and the Supreme Court, consider these points:

  1. Regulatory Oversight: The Supreme Court operates under strict constitutional guidelines, while car dealers are regulated by state and federal laws.
  2. Public Perception: The Supreme Court is generally viewed as a neutral arbiter of justice, whereas car dealers often face skepticism regarding sales practices.
  3. Accountability: Justices are appointed for life and can only be removed through impeachment, while car dealers can face immediate consequences for unethical behavior.
  4. Transparency: Supreme Court decisions are publicly documented and debated, while car dealer transactions can lack transparency.
  5. Consumer Protection: There are numerous consumer protection laws for car buyers, but enforcement can vary widely by state.
  6. Legal Precedent: Supreme Court rulings set binding legal precedents, while car dealer practices can differ significantly from one dealer to another.

所有跟帖: 

我在原帖加了截屏 -大洋bridge- 给 大洋bridge 发送悄悄话 大洋bridge 的博客首页 (0 bytes) () 06/27/2025 postreply 11:36:55

这不也是AI小结吗? -Uusequery- 给 Uusequery 发送悄悄话 (167 bytes) () 06/27/2025 postreply 11:42:29

请您先登陆,再发跟帖!