Table 1 Summary of the main functional imaging techniques used in phase I clinical trials in which a significant change in imaging parameters following treatment has been observed
From: Functional imaging: what evidence is there for its utility in clinical trials of targeted therapies?
Technique | Coverage | Imaging principle | Biological feature explored | Imaging parameters (most used) | Reproducibility | Agent | Target | Time points at which a statistically significant change in imaging parameters has been observed |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCE (dynamic contrast enhanced)-MRI | Single organ; 12–14 slices (6–7 cm) | Changes in T1 signal intensity after administration of low molecular weight contrast agent | Tissue perfusion and vascularity | IAUGC (Integrated area under Gadolinium curve) | wCV=12–16% r=26–30% (Morgan et al, 2006) | Axitinib (AG013736) | VEGFR1, 2; PDGFR-β | 2 and 28 days (Liu et al, 2005) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | Cediranib (AZD2171) | VEGFR1,2,3; PDGFR-α, -β c-KIT | 1 and 2 and 5 and 28 and 112 days (Batchelor et al, 2007; Drevs et al, 2007) |
 |  |  |  | Ktrans (transfer constant) | wCV=19–29% r=30–36% (Morgan et al, 2006) | Sorafenib (BAY 43–9006) | Raf-1; wtBRAF; VEGFR2,3; PDGFR-β; FLT-3; KIT; FGFR-1 | 12 weeks (Flaherty et al, 2008) 2.7–10.9 weeks (median 6.1) (Hahn et al, 2008) |
 |  |  |  |  | wCV=24% (Galbraith et al, 2002a) | Intedanib (BIBF-1120) | VEGFR 1,2,3; FGFR 1, 2,3; PDGFR, Src, Lck, Lyn, FLT-3 | 3 and 30 days (Mross et al, 2010) |
 |  |  |  | kep (rate constant) | wCV=9% (Galbraith et al, 2002a) | Brivanib (BMS-582664) | VEGFR2, VEGFR3, FGFR1 FGFR2 | 2 and 8 and 26 days (Jonker et al, 2011) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | HuMV833 | VEGF | 48 h and 35 days (Jayson et al, 2002) |
 |  |  |  | ve (extracellular space) |  | Vatalanib (PTK787/ZK-222584) | VEGFR 2 | 2 and 28 and 30days (Morgan et al, 2003) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | Sunitinib (SU11248) | VEGFR-1, -2; PDGFRβ; KIT; FLT-4; c-FMS | 14 days (Zhu et al, 2009) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | CA4P | Tubulin polymerization; | 4–6 h and 24 h (Dowlati et al, 2002) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | Vadimezan (DMXAA) | Established tumour blood vessels | 24 h (Galbraith et al, 2002b) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | ZD6126 | Colchicin analogue (tubulin binding) | 24 h (Evelhoch et al, 2004) |
DCE-CT | Single organ 4–8 slices (2.5–5 mm) | Changes in CT density (HU) following administration of iodinated contrast agent | Tissue perfusion and vascularity | rBV (relative blood volume) | wCV 14–15% r=38% (Goh et al, 2006) | Bevacizumab | Humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody | 10–12 days (Jiang et al, 2012) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) | Raf-1; wtBRAF; VEGFR-2, -3; PDGFR-β; FLT-3; KIT; FGFR-1 | 6 weeks (Fournier et al, 2010) |
 |  |  |  | rBF (relative blood flow) | wCV=23% r=65% (Goh et al, 2006) | Sunitinib (SU11248) | VEGFR1,2,3; PDGFR-α, -β; KIT; FLT-3; CSFR-1; RET | 6 weeks (Fournier et al, 2010) |
 |  |  |  | MTT (mean transit time ) | wCV=35% r=97% (Goh et al, 2006) |  |  |  |
DCE-US | Single lesion single slice | Enhanced representation of the vasculature following administration of microbubbles | Tissue perfusion and vascularity | AUC (area under curve) | No data available in clinical studies | Bevacizumab | Humanized anti-VEGF monoclonal antibody | 3 and 7 and 14 and 60 days (Lassau et al, 2011) |
 |  |  |  | BF (blood flow) |  | Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) | Raf 1; wtBRAF; VEGFR-2, -3; PDGFR-β; FLT-3; KIT; FGFR-1 | 3 and 6 weeks (Lamuraglia et al, 2006) |
 |  |  |  | PI (peak intensity) |  | Sunitinib (SU11248) | VEGFR-1, -2,-3; PDGFR-α, β; KIT; FLT-3; CSFR-1; R | 15 days (Lassau et al, 2010) |
 |  |  |  | TPI (time to PI) |  |  |  |  |
Diffusion Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (DW-MRI) | Whole organ coverage routinely; whole body diffusion available | Measures water tissue diffusibility by applying two, balanced, opposing magnitude, gradient pulses to a conventional T2w, spin-echo MRI sequence | Indirect assessment of tissue cellularity and presence of necrosis | ADC) (apparent diffusion coefficient) | r%=13.3 (Koh et al, 2009) two centre trial | CA4P Cediranib (AZD 2171) | Tubulin polymerization VEGFR1,2,3; PDGFR-α, -β c-KIT | 3 h after 2nd dose (Koh et al, 2009) 1 and 28 and 56 days (Batchelor et al, 2007) |
18F-FDG (glucose analogue) PET | Whole body | 18F-FDG enters the cell via glucose transporters, phosphorylated by hexokinase and then trapped within cells. | Glucose utilization in tumour cells. | SUV max (standardized unit value) | wCV=10.7–15.9% r=−(34–27)% to +(37–52)% multicenter data | Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) | Raf-1; wtBRAF; VEGFR-2, -3; PDGFR-β; FLT-3; KIT; FGFR-1 | 3 weeks (Siemerink et al, 2008) |
 |  |  |  |  | r=6–10–42% | Sunitinib (SU11248) | VEGFR-1, -2,-3; PDGFR-α, -β; KIT; FLT-3; CSFR-1; RET | 10–14 day (Van den Abbeele et al, 2008) |
 |  |  |  |  | Single centre data acquisition (Nahmias and Wahl, 2008; Velasquez et al, 2009) | rh-Endo recombinant human endostatin | Proliferation and migration of capillary endothelial cells | 28 and 56 days (Herbst et al, 2002) |
 |  |  |  | SUV mean | 1–7% (Nahmias and Wahl, 2008) | Gefitinib | EGFR | 2 days and 4 weeks (Sunaga et al, 2008) |
18F-FLT (flurothymidine) PET | Whole body | Enter cells via nucleoside transporter proteins, phosphorylated by thymidine kinase, trapped intracellularly, but not incorporated into DNA | Tissue proliferation rate | SUV 41% | ICC=0.98 (95% CI 0.95–0.99) r=15% | Sunitinib | VEGFR-1, -2,-3; PDGFR-α, -β; KIT; FLT-3; CSFR-1; RET | 4 weeks (Liu et al, 2011) |
 |  |  |  | SUV max | ICC=0.93 (95% CI 0.85–0.97) r=20–25% (de Langen et al, 2009) |  |  |  |
H215O- (labeled H2O) PET | Whole body | Inhaled C15O2 or intravenous H215O. reach an equilibrium in which the diffusion rate into the tissue from the arterial blood is balanced by the diffusion rate out of the tissue into venous blood and the rate of radioactive decay of the 15O: | Tissue blood flow and oxygen utilization | Tumour perfusion | r=15.8–40% (depending on VOI selection method) (van der Veldt et al, 2010) | rh-Endo recombinant human endostatin | Proliferation and migration of capillary endothelial cells | 28 and 56 days (Herbst et al, 2002) |
 |  |  |  |  |  | CA4P | Tubulin polymerization | 24 h (Anderson et al, 2003) |
 |  |  |  | Regional flow | wCV 11% (van der Veldt et al, 2010) |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  | Volume of distribution (VT or Vd) | r=32% (van der Veldt et al, 2010) |  |  |  |
 |  |  |  |  | r=36–47% (de Langen et al, 2008) |  |  |  |