Fig. 2: The distinction between Flt3 and Tie2 in Ly6C+ and Ly6C− AMs.

Gating strategy for AMs (CD45 + Siglec-F + CD11b-CD11c + CD64 + ), CD11b + DCs (CD11b + MHC-II + CD11c + CD24 + CD64-), CD103 + DCs (CD11c + CD103 + CD24 + ), eosinophils (Siglec-F + CD11b + CD11c-), interstitial macrophages (CD11b + MHC-II + CD11c + CD64 + CD24-), Ly6C+ monocytes and macrophages, Ly6C− monocytes and macrophages (CD11b + MHC-II-CD64+/−), and neutrophils (CD11b+ Ly6G+) in the mouse lung and the RGS1 expression in the cells were evaluated (a). Gating strategy for endovascular progenitor (EVP, CD45-CD31lowVEGFRlow), transit-amplifying (TA, CD45-CD31intVEGFRint), and definitive differentiated cells (D, CD45-CD31hiVEGFRhi) and their RGS1 expression were evaluated (b). The expression of Flt3 and Tie2 was evaluated in Ly6C+ or Ly6C− brain macrophages (c), intestinal macrophages (d), and lung macrophages (e). Construction mode diagrams of RGS1fl/fl;Flt3-CreERt2 and RGS1fl/fl;Tie2-CreERt2 (f). One week after tamoxifen treatment, the expression of RGS1 in RGS1Flt3 and RGS1Tie2 mice in Flt3 + Ly6Chi AMs, Flt3 + Ly6Clow AMs, and Tie2 + Ly6C− AMs was detected (g, h). The data are shown as the mean ± SD; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by ANOVA, and “n.s.” indicates not statistically significant. The data in a-e were derived from 3 independent experiments. The data in g and h are based on 3 mice in each group.