Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Review Article
  • Published:

Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between SLCO1B1 and statins and CYP2C9 and sulfonylureas

A Comment to this article was published on 05 February 2025

Abstract

Aligned with the mission of the Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) to promote the implementation of pharmacogenetics (PGx), this guideline is specifically designed to optimize pharmacotherapy of cholesterol lowering medication (statins) and glucose lowering medication (sulfonylureas). The SLCO1B1 c.521 T > C variant reduces the activity of the SLCO1B1 transporter involved in statin transport out of the blood into the liver. High blood concentrations of statins increase the risk of serious myopathy. For simvastatin, the DPWG recommends choosing an alternative in homozygotes for these gene variant and to preferably choose an alternative in heterozygotes. For atorvastatin, the DPWG recommends to preferably choose an alternative in carriers of this gene variant having additional risk factors for myopathy. For rosuvastatin, the DPWG recommends keeping the dose as low as possible in carriers of this gene variant with additional risk factors. No therapy adjustment is required for fluvastatin and pravastatin in carriers of this gene variant. Gene variants can diminish the activity of the enzyme CYP2C9, that converts sulfonylurea to less effective metabolites. Although CYP2C9 gene variants may lead to increased levels of glibenclamide, gliclazide, glimepiride, and tolbutamide, no therapy adjustments are required in patients with these variants. The main reason is that there was either no negative clinical effect or an increase in hypoglycemic, which is of less importance than the increase in effectiveness it signals. The DPWG classifies pre-emptive SLCO1B1 testing as ‘essential’ for simvastatin 80 mg/day, ‘beneficial’ for simvastatin up to 40 mg/day, and ‘potentially beneficial’ for atorvastatin and rosuvastatin.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data and material are either included in the supplementary information or publicly available (i.e. the published articles, PubMed). The guidelines and background information are available on KNMP.nl [14] and will be available on PharmGKB.org.

References

  1. Swen JJ, Huizinga TW, Gelderblom H, de Vries EG, Assendelft WJ, Kirchheiner J, et al. Translating pharmacogenomics: challenges on the road to the clinic. PLoS Med. 2007;4:e209.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, de Boer A, Grandia L, Maitland-van der Zee AH, Mulder H, et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte-an update of guidelines. Clin Pharm Ther. 2011;89:662–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Swen JJ, Nijenhuis M, van Rhenen M, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk AM, Houwink EJF, et al. Pharmacogenetic information in clinical guidelines: the European perspective. Clin Pharm Ther. 2018;103:795–801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. European Association for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics (EACPT). Available from: https://www.eacpt.eu/.

  5. European Association of Hospital Pharmacists (EAHP). Available from: https://www.eahp.eu/.

  6. Vinci P, Panizon E, Tosoni LM, Cerrato C, Pellicori F, Mearelli F, et al. Statin-associated myopathy: emphasis on mechanisms and targeted therapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:11687.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vrablik M, Zlatohlavek L, Stulc T, Adamkova V, Prusikova M, Schwarzova L, et al. Statin-associated myopathy: from genetic predisposition to clinical management. Physiol Res. 2014;63:S327–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alfirevic A, Neely D, Armitage J, Chinoy H, Cooper RG, Laaksonen R, et al. Phenotype standardization for statin-induced myotoxicity. Clin Pharm Ther. 2014;96:470–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). SLCO1B1 solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 1B1 [Homo sapiens (human)]; Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/10599.

  10. Niemi M, Pasanen MK, Neuvonen PJ. Organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1: a genetically polymorphic transporter of major importance for hepatic drug uptake. Pharm Rev. 2011;63:157–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Romaine SP, Bailey KM, Hall AS, Balmforth AJ. The influence of SLCO1B1 (OATP1B1) gene polymorphisms on response to statin therapy. Pharmacogenomics J. 2010;10:1–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Manson LEN, Nijenhuis M, Soree B, de Boer-Veger NJ, Buunk AM, Houwink EJF, et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction of CYP2C9, HLA-A and HLA-B with anti-epileptic drugs. Eur J Hum Genet. 2024;32:903–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Swen JJ, Wilting I, de Goede AL, Grandia L, Mulder H, Touw DJ, et al. Pharmacogenetics: from bench to byte. Clin Pharm Ther. 2008;83:781–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association (KNMP). Pharmacogenetic Recommendation Text. Available from: https://www.knmp.nl/.

  15. Karamperis K, Koromina M, Papantoniou P, Skokou M, Kanellakis F, Mitropoulos K, et al. Economic evaluation in psychiatric pharmacogenomics: a systematic review. Pharmacogenomics J. 2021;21:533–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Simeonidis S, Koutsilieri S, Vozikis A, Cooper DN, Mitropoulou C, Patrinos GP. Application of economic evaluation to assess feasibility for reimbursement of genomic testing as part of personalized medicine interventions. Front Pharm. 2019;10:830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bank PCD, Caudle KE, Swen JJ, Gammal RS, Whirl-Carrillo M, Klein TE, et al. Comparison of the guidelines of the clinical pharmacogenetics implementation consortium and the Dutch pharmacogenetics working group. Clin Pharm Ther. 2018;103:599–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Cooper-DeHoff RM, Niemi M, Ramsey LB, Luzum JA, Tarkiainen EK, Straka RJ, et al. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium Guideline for SLCO1B1, ABCG2, and CYP2C9 genotypes and Statin-Associated Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Clin Pharm Ther. 2022;111:1007–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank Anna de Goede for performing the first systematic review for tolbutamide in 2006 and Yasmina Laouti for performing the second systematic reviews for atorvastatin and fluvastatin in 2020.

Funding

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 668353. The DPWG received funding from the Royal Dutch Pharmacists Association.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DFGJW drafted the manuscript. EJHF supervised drafting of the manuscript and contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. MN performed most of the literature searches and article summaries and suggested clinical decision support texts. BS had the clinical decision support texts translated in English and published them. NBV, AB, HJG, AR, GAR, RHNS, JJS, DT, and RW contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. VHMD led the meetings in which the DPWG decided about the article summaries and clinical decision supports texts and contributed to conceiving the work and interpretation of the results. In addition, all authors revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marga Nijenhuis.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The Pharmacogenetics Working Group of the KNMP (DPWG) formulates the optimal recommendations for each phenotype group based on the available evidence. If this optimal recommendation cannot be followed due to practical restrictions, e.g. therapeutic drug monitoring or a lower dose is not available, then the health care professional should consider the next best option.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wolthuis, D.F.G.J., Nijenhuis, M., Soree, B. et al. Dutch Pharmacogenetics Working Group (DPWG) guideline for the gene-drug interaction between SLCO1B1 and statins and CYP2C9 and sulfonylureas. Eur J Hum Genet 33, 413–420 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01769-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-024-01769-7

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links