1. Kim TI, Alio Del Barrio JL, Wilkins M, Cochener B, Ang M. Refractive surgery. Lancet. 2019;393:2085–98.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

2. Sugar A, Hood CT, Mian SI. Patient-reported outcomes following LASIK: quality of Life in the PROWL Studies. JAMA. 2017;317:204–5.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Sugar A, Rapuano CJ, Culbertson WW, Huang D, Varley GA, Agapitos PJ, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and astigmatism: safety and efficacy: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2002;109:175–87.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Sandoval HP, Donnenfeld ED, Kohnen T, Lindstrom RL, Potvin R, Tremblay DM, et al. Modern laser in situ keratomileusis outcomes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1224–34.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

5. Eydelman M, Hilmantel G, Tarver ME, Hofmeister EM, May J, Hammel K, et al. Symptoms and satisfaction of patients in the patient-reported outcomes with laser in situ keratomileusis (PROWL) studies. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2017;135:13–22.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. Ang M, Mehta JS, Chan C, Htoon HM, Koh JC, Tan DT. Refractive lenticule extraction: transition and comparison of 3 surgical techniques. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1415–24.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Ang M, Tan D, Mehta JS. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK): study protocol for a randomized, non-inferiority trial. Trials. 2012;13:75.

   PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

8. Mi H, Tan N, Ang M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Comparison of anterior and posterior topographic analysis between 3 imaging systems. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2533–45.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

9. Chan C, Ang M, Saad A, Chua D, Mejia M, Lim L, et al. Validation of an objective scoring system for forme fruste keratoconus detection and post-LASIK ectasia risk assessment in Asian eyes. Cornea. 2015;34:996–1004.

   PubMed  Google Scholar 

10. Roberts CJ, Mahmoud AM, Bons JP, Hossain A, Elsheikh A, Vinciguerra R, et al. Introduction of two novel stiffness parameters and interpretation of air puff-induced biomechanical deformation parameters with a dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:266–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Ambrosio R Jr., Lopes BT, Faria-Correia F, Salomao MQ, Buhren J, Roberts CJ, et al. Integration of Scheimpflug-based corneal tomography and biomechanical assessments for enhancing ectasia detection. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:434–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Ang M, Baskaran M, Werkmeister RM, Chua J, Schmidl D, Aranha Dos Santos V, et al. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2018;66:132–56.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

13. Ang M, Chong W, Huang H, Tay WT, Wong TY, He MG, et al. Comparison of anterior segment optical tomography parameters measured using a semi-automatic software to standard clinical instruments. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e65559.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

14. Sikorski BL, Suchon P. OCT biometry (B-OCT): a new method for measuring ocular axial dimensions. J Ophthalmol. 2019;2019:9192456.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

15. Silverman RH, Urs R, Roychoudhury A, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Reinstein DZ. Epithelial remodeling as basis for machine-based identification of keratoconus. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55:1580–7.

    Google Scholar 

16. Reinstein DZ, Srivannaboon S, Gobbe M, Archer TJ, Silverman RH, Sutton H, et al. Epithelial thickness profile changes induced by myopic LASIK as measured by Artemis very high-frequency digital ultrasound. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:444–50.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

17. Gatinel D, Azar DT, Dumas L, Malet J. Effect of anterior corneal surface asphericity modification on fourth-order zernike spherical aberrations. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:708–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Amigo A, Martinez-Sorribes P, Recuerda M. Refractive changes induced by spherical aberration in laser correction procedures: an adaptive optics study. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:470–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

19. Gatinel D, Malet J, Dumas L. Polynomial decomposition method for ocular wavefront analysis. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2018;35:2035–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C, Haddad NM, Grise-Dulac A, Gatinel D. Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:629–35. 635 e621-2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

21. Artal P, Benito A, Perez GM, Alcon E, De Casas A, Pujol J, et al. An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e16823.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

22. Panthier C, de Wazieres A, Rouger H, Moran S, Saad A, Gatinel D. Average lens density quantification with swept-source optical coherence tomography: optimized, automated cataract grading technique. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:1746–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Accardo PA, Pensiero S. Neural network-based system for early keratoconus detection from corneal topography. J Biomed Inf. 2002;35:151–9.

    Google Scholar 

24. Kovacs I, Mihaltz K, Kranitz K, Juhasz E, Takacs A, Dienes L, et al. Accuracy of machine learning classifiers using bilateral data from a Scheimpflug camera for identifying eyes with preclinical signs of keratoconus. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:275–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

25. Arbelaez MC, Versaci F, Vestri G, Barboni P, Savini G. Use of a support vector machine for keratoconus and subclinical keratoconus detection by topographic and tomographic data. Ophthalmology. 2012;119:2231–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Smadja D, Touboul D, Cohen A, Doveh E, Santhiago MR, Mello GR, et al. Detection of subclinical keratoconus using an automated decision tree classification. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;156:237–46 e231.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Yousefi S, Yousefi E, Takahashi H, Hayashi T, Tampo H, Inoda S, et al. Keratoconus severity identification using unsupervised machine learning. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0205998.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

28. Melles RB, Holladay JT, Chang WJ. Accuracy of intraocular lens calculation formulas. Ophthalmology. 2018;125:169–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

29. Shammas HJ, Chan S. Precision of biometry, keratometry, and refractive measurements with a partial coherence interferometry-keratometry device. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:1474–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

30. Shajari M, Kolb CM, Petermann K, Bohm M, Herzog M, de’Lorenzo N, et al. Comparison of 9 modern intraocular lens power calculation formulas for a quadrifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:942–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Connell BJ, Kane JX. Comparison of the Kane formula with existing formulas for intraocular lens power selection. BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2019;4:e000251.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

32. Kanellopoulos AJ, Pallikaris IG, Donnenfeld ED, Detorakis S, Koufala K, Perry HD. Comparison of corneal sensation following photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1997;23:34–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

33. Amm M, Wetzel W, Winter M, Uthoff D, Duncker GI. Histopathological comparison of photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis in rabbits. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:758–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

34. Azar DT, Ang RT, Lee JB, Kato T, Chen CC, Jain S, et al. Laser subepithelial keratomileusis: electron microscopy and visual outcomes of flap photorefractive keratectomy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001;12:323–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

35. Chen CC, Chang JH, Lee JB, Javier J, Azar DT. Human corneal epithelial cell viability and morphology after dilute alcohol exposure. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:2593–602.

    Google Scholar 

36. Fadlallah A, Fahed D, Khalil K, Dunia I, Menassa J, El Rami H, et al. Transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy: clinical results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1852–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

37. Antonios R, Abdul Fattah M, Arba Mosquera S, Abiad BH, Sleiman K, Awwad ST. Single-step transepithelial versus alcohol-assisted photorefractive keratectomy in the treatment of high myopia: a comparative evaluation over 12 months. Br J Ophthalmol. 2017;101:1106–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

38. Wen D, McAlinden C, Flitcroft I, Tu R, Wang Q, Alio J, et al. Postoperative efficacy, predictability, safety, and visual quality of laser corneal refractive surgery: a network meta-analysis. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:65–78.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

39. Sanchez P, Moutsouris K, Pandolfi A. Biomechanical and optical behavior of human corneas before and after photorefractive keratectomy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:905–17.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

40. Vestergaard AH. Past and present of corneal refractive surgery: a retrospective study of long-term results after photorefractive keratectomy and a prospective study of refractive lenticule extraction. Acta Ophthalmol. 2014;2:1–21. 92 Thesis.

    Google Scholar 

41. Munnerlyn CR, Koons SJ, Marshall J. Photorefractive keratectomy: a technique for laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1988;14:46–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

42. Na KS, Chung SH, Kim JK, Jang EJ, Lee NR, Joo CK. Comparison of LASIK and surface ablation by using propensity score analysis: a multicenter study in Korea. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:7116–21.

    Google Scholar 

43. Wachtlin J, Langenbeck K, Schrunder S, Zhang EP, Hoffmann F. Immunohistology of corneal wound healing after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Refract Surg. 1999;15:451–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

44. Kim TI, Pak JH, Lee SY, Tchah H. Mitomycin C-induced reduction of keratocytes and fibroblasts after photorefractive keratectomy. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:2978–84.

    Google Scholar 

45. Lee DH, Chung HS, Jeon YC, Boo SD, Yoon YD, Kim JG. Photorefractive keratectomy with intraoperative mitomycin-C application. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2005;31:2293–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

46. Faktorovich EG, Melwani K. Efficacy and safety of pain relief medications after photorefractive keratectomy: review of prospective randomized trials. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1716–30.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

47. Shemesh G, Dotan G, Lipshitz I. Predictability of corneal flap thickness in laser in situ keratomileusis using three different microkeratomes. J Refract Sur. 2002;18:S347–351.

    Google Scholar 

48. Santhiago MR, Kara-Junior N, Waring GOt. Microkeratome versus femtosecond flaps: accuracy and complications. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2014;25:270–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

49. Solomon KD, Donnenfeld E, Sandoval HP, Al Sarraf O, Kasper TJ, Holzer MP, et al. Flap thickness accuracy: comparison of 6 microkeratome models. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30:964–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

50. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Accuracy and reproducibility of Cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:810–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

51. Zhai CB, Tian L, Zhou YH, Zhang QW, Zhang J. Comparison of the flaps made by femtosecond laser and automated keratomes for sub-bowman keratomileusis. Chin Med J. 2013;126:2440–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

52. Zhao LQ, Wei RL, Cheng JW, Li Y, Cai JP, Ma XY. Meta-analysis: clinical outcomes of laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy and photorefractive keratectomy in myopia. Ophthalmology. 2010;117:1912–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

53. Wallerstein A, Jackson WB, Chambers J, Moezzi AM, Lin H, Simmons PA. Management of post-LASIK dry eye: a multicenter randomized comparison of a new multi-ingredient artificial tear to carboxymethylcellulose. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:839–48.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

54. Segev F, Mimouni M, Sela T, Munzer G, Kaiserman I. Risk factors for sporadic diffuse lamellar keratitis after microkeratome laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis: a retrospective large database analysis. Cornea. 2018;37:1124–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

55. Yesilirmak N, Chhadva P, Cabot F, Galor A, Yoo SH. Post-laser in situ keratomileusis epithelial ingrowth: treatment, recurrence, and long-term results. Cornea. 2018;37:1517–21.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

56. Ayala MJ, Alio JL, Mulet ME, De La Hoz F. Treatment of laser in situ keratomileusis interface epithelial ingrowth with neodymium:yytrium-aluminum-garnet laser. Am J Ophthalmol. 2008;145:630–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

57. Bohac M, Koncarevic M, Pasalic A, Biscevic A, Merlak M, Gabric N, et al. Incidence and clinical characteristics of post LASIK ectasia: a review of over 30,000 LASIK cases. Semin Ophthalmol. 2018;33:869–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

58. Seiler T, Genth U, Holschbach A, Derse M. Aspheric photorefractive keratectomy with excimer laser. Refract Corneal Surg. 1993;9:166–72.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

59. O’Brart DP, Corbett MC, Lohmann CP, Kerr Muir MG, Marshall J. The effects of ablation diameter on the outcome of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Arch Ophthalmol. 1995;113:438–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

60. Kalski RS, Sutton G, Bin Y, Lawless MA, Rogers C. Comparison of 5-mm and 6-mm ablation zones in photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. J Refract Surg. 1996;12:61–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

61. Buhren J, Pesudovs K, Martin T, Strenger A, Yoon G, Kohnen T. Comparison of optical quality metrics to predict subjective quality of vision after laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:846–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

62. Drum BA. Aberration analyses needed for FDA evaluation of safety and effectiveness of wavefront-guided refractive surgical devices. J Refract Surg. 2003;19:S588–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

63. Pesudovs K. Wavefront aberration outcomes of LASIK for high myopia and high hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2005;21:S508–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

64. Myrowitz EH, Chuck RS. A comparison of wavefront-optimized and wavefront-guided ablations. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2009;20:247–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

65. Jun I, Kang DS, Tan J, Choi JY, Heo W, Kim JY, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between wavefront-optimized versus corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy for myopic astigmatism. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:174–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

66. Lee WS, Manche EE. Comparison of simulated keratometric changes following wavefront-guided and wavefront-optimized myopic laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis. Clin Ophthalmol. 2018;12:613–9.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

67. Moshirfar M, Shah TJ, Skanchy DF, Linn SH, Kang P, Durrie DS. Comparison and analysis of FDA reported visual outcomes of the three latest platforms for LASIK: wavefront guided Visx iDesign, topography guided WaveLight Allegro Contoura, and topography guided Nidek EC-5000 CATz. Clin Ophthalmol. 2017;11:135–47.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

68. Schallhorn SC, Farjo AA, Huang D, Boxer Wachler BS, Trattler WB, Tanzer DJ, et al. Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2008;115:1249–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

69. Smadja D, Reggiani-Mello G, Santhiago MR, Krueger RR. Wavefront ablation profiles in refractive surgery: description, results, and limitations. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:224–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

70. Goldberg DB. Laser in situ keratomileusis monovision. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27:1449–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

71. Miranda D, Krueger RR. Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:325–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

72. Ayoubi MG, Leccisotti A, Goodall EA, McGilligan VE, Moore TC. Femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis versus conductive keratoplasty to obtain monovision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2010;36:997–1002.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

73. Fawcett SL, Herman WK, Alfieri CD, Castleberry KA, Parks MM, Birch EE. Stereoacuity and foveal fusion in adults with long-standing surgical monovision. J Aapos. 2001;5:342–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

74. Kato S, Ito M, Shimizu K, Kamiya K. Etiology and outcomes of secondary surgical intervention for dissatisfied patients after pseudophakic monovision. Int Ophthalmol. 2018;38:1003–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

75. Holland D. PresbyLASIK treatment for simultaneous correction of presbyopia and ametropia: development to PresbyMAX hybrid at the Augenklinik Bellevue. ESCRS. 2014.

76. Chan TC, Kwok PS, Jhanji V, Woo VC, Ng AL. Presbyopic correction using monocular Bi-aspheric ablation profile (PresbyMAX) in hyperopic eyes: 1-year outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:37–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

77. Luger MH, McAlinden C, Buckhurst PJ, Wolffsohn JS, Verma S, Arba Mosquera S. Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments. Am J Ophthalmol. 2015;160:493–505.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

78. Vargas-Fragoso V, Alio JL. Corneal compensation of presbyopia: PresbyLASIK: an updated review. Eye Vis. 2017;4:11.

    Google Scholar 

79. Rocha KM, Vabre L, Chateau N, Krueger RR. Expanding depth of focus by modifying higher-order aberrations induced by an adaptive optics visual simulator. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1885–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

80. Benard Y, Lopez-Gil N, Legras R. Optimizing the subjective depth-of-focus with combinations of fourth- and sixth-order spherical aberration. Vis Res. 2011;51:2471–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

81. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Laser blended vision for presbyopia correction. In: Pallikaris IG, Plainis S, Charman WN, (eds). Presbyopia: origins, effects and treatment. Thorofare, NJ: SLACK Incorporated; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

82. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for myopic astigmatism and presbyopia using non-linear aspheric micro-monovision with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL 80 platform. J Refract Surg. 2011;27:23–37.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

83. Reinstein DZ, Couch DG, Archer TJ. LASIK for hyperopic astigmatism and presbyopia using Micro-monovision With the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80. J Refract Surg. 2009;25:37–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

84. Evans BJ. Monovision: a review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2007;27:417–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

85. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. LASIK for the correction of presbyopia in emmetropic patients using aspheric ablation profiles and a micro-monovision protocol with the Carl Zeiss Meditec MEL80 and VisuMax. J Refract Surg. 2012;28:531–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

86. Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JO. Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:403–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

87. Sekundo W, Gertnere J, Bertelmann T, Solomatin I. One-year refractive results, contrast sensitivity, high-order aberrations and complications after myopic small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx SMILE). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2014;252:837–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

88. Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Reinstein DZ, Shah R, Santiago-Caban L, Fenzl CR. Small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:652–65.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

89. Denoyer A, Landman E, Trinh L, Faure JF, Auclin F, Baudouin C. Dry eye disease after refractive surgery: comparative outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction versus LASIK. Ophthalmology. 2015;122:669–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

90. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Bartoli E. Corneal sensitivity after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1580–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

91. Randleman JB, Dawson DG, Grossniklaus HE, McCarey BE, Edelhauser HF. Depth-dependent cohesive tensile strength in human donor corneas: implications for refractive surgery. J Refract Surg. 2008;24:S85–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

92. Scarcelli G, Pineda R, Yun SH. Brillouin optical microscopy for corneal biomechanics. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:185–90.

    Google Scholar 

93. Petsche SJ, Chernyak D, Martiz J, Levenston ME, Pinsky PM. Depth-dependent transverse shear properties of the human corneal stroma. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:873–80.

    Google Scholar 

94. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Randleman JB. Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:454–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

95. Seven I, Vahdati A, Pedersen IB, Vestergaard A, Hjortdal J, Roberts CJ, et al. Contralateral eye comparison of SMILE and Flap-Based corneal refractive surgery: computational analysis of biomechanical impact. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:444–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

96. Sinha Roy A, Dupps WJ Jr., Roberts CJ. Comparison of biomechanical effects of small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis: finite-element analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:971–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

97. Spiru B, Kling S, Hafezi F, Sekundo W. Biomechanical differences between femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx) and small incision lenticule extraction (SmILE) tested by 2D-extensometry in ex vivo porcine eyes. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2017;58:2591–5.

    Google Scholar 

98. Pedersen IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Changes in astigmatism, densitometry, and aberrations after SMILE for low to high myopic astigmatism: a 12-month prospective study. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:11–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

99. Damgaard IB, Ang M, Mahmoud AM, Farook M, Roberts CJ, Mehta JS. Functional optical zone and centration following SMILE and LASIK: a prospective, randomized, contralateral Eye Study. J Refract Surg. 2019;35:230–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

100. Han T, Shang J, Zhou X, Xu Y, Ang M, Zhou X. Refractive outcomes comparing small-incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2020;46:419–27.

101. Ji YW, Kang DSY, Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Choi JY, Kim EK, et al. Effect of lowering laser energy on the surface roughness of human corneal lenticules in small-incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:617–24.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

102. Ji YW, Kim M, Yong Kang DS, Reinstein D, Archer T, Choi JY, et al. Lower laser energy levels lead to better visual recovery after small-incision lenticule extraction: prospective, randomized clinical trial. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;179:159–70.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

103. Donate D, Thaeron R. Lower energy levels improve visual recovery in small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). J Refract Surg. 2016;32:636–42.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

104. Li L, Schallhorn JM, Ma J, Cui T, Wang Y. Energy setting and visual outcomes in SMILE: a retrospective Cohort Study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:11–6.

     CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

105. Shen Z, Shi K, Yu Y, Yu X, Lin Y, Yao K. Small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) versus femtosecond laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158176.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

106. Zhang Y, Shen Q, Jia Y, Zhou D, Zhou J. Clinical outcomes of SMILE and FS-LASIK used to treat myopia: a meta-analysis. J Refract Surg. 2016;32:256–65.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

107. Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Randomized clinical trial comparing femtosecond LASIK and small-incision lenticule extraction. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:724–30.

108. Ang M, Ho H, Fenwick E, Lamoureux E, Htoon HM, Koh J, et al. Vision-related quality of life and visual outcomes after small-incision lenticule extraction and laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:2136–44.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

109. Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Tan D, Mehta JS. Simulated night vision after small-incision lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:1173–80.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

110. Damgaard IB, Ang M, Farook M, Htoon HM, Mehta JS. Intraoperative patient experience and postoperative visual quality after SMILE and LASIK in a randomized, paired-eye, controlled study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:92–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

111. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Carp GI. Suction stability management in small incision lenticule extraction: incidence and outcomes of suction loss in 4000 consecutive procedures. Acta Ophthalmol. 2020;98:e72–e80.

112. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Vida RS, Carp GI. Suction stability management in SMILE: development of a decision tree for managing eye movements and suction loss. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:809–16.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

113. Ang M, Chaurasia SS, Angunawela RI, Poh R, Riau A, Tan D, et al. Femtosecond lenticule extraction (FLEx): clinical results, interface evaluation, and intraocular pressure variation. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53:1414–21.

     Google Scholar 

114. Reinstein DZ, Stuart AJ, Vida RS, Archer TJ, Carp GI. Incidence and outcomes of sterile multifocal inflammatory keratitis and diffuse lamellar keratitis after SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:751–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

115. Siedlecki J, Luft N, Mayer WJ, Siedlecki M, Kook D, Meyer B, et al. CIRCLE enhancement after myopic SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:304–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

116. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Vida RS. Outcomes of re-treatment by LASIK After SMILE. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:578–88.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

117. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Carp GI. The surgeon’s guide to small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Thorofare, New Jersey: SLACK Incorporated; 2018.

     Google Scholar 

118. Ganesh S, Gupta R. Comparison of visual and refractive outcomes following femtosecond laser- assisted lasik with smile in patients with myopia or myopic astigmatism. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:590–6.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

119. Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M. Outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in low myopia. J Refract Surg. 2014;30:812–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

120. Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Dhungana P. Quality control outcomes analysis of small-incision lenticule extraction for myopia by a novice surgeon at the first refractive surgery unit in Nepal during the first 2 years of operation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:267–74.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

121. Jacob S, Kumar DA, Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Aravind R, Saijimol AI. Preliminary evidence of successful near vision enhancement with a new technique: PrEsbyopic Allogenic Refractive Lenticule (PEARL) Corneal Inlay Using a SMILE Lenticule. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:224–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

122. Li M, Li M, Sun L, Ni K, Zhou X. Predictive formula for refraction of autologous lenticule implantation for hyperopia correction. J Refract Surg. 2017;33:827–33.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

123. Pradhan KR, Reinstein DZ, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, Gurung R. Femtosecond laser-assisted keyhole endokeratophakia: correction of hyperopia by implantation of an allogeneic lenticule obtained by SMILE from a myopic donor. J Refractive Surg. 2013;29:777–82.

     Google Scholar 

124. Alio Del Barrio JL, El Zarif M, Azaar A, Makdissy N, Khalil C, Harb W, et al. Corneal stroma enhancement with decellularized stromal laminas with or without stem cell recellularization for advanced keratoconus. Am J Ophthalmol. 2018;186:47–58.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

125. Mastropasqua L, Nubile M, Salgari N, Mastropasqua R. Femtosecond laser-assisted stromal lenticule addition keratoplasty for the treatment of advanced keratoconus: a Preliminary Study. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:36–44.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

126. Alio del Barrio JL, Chiesa M, Garagorri N, Garcia-Urquia N, Fernandez-Delgado J, Bataille L, et al. Acellular human corneal matrix sheets seeded with human adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells integrate functionally in an experimental animal model. Exp Eye Res. 2015;132:91–100.

     CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

127. Liu YC, Teo EPW, Ang HP, Seah XY, Lwin NC, Yam GHF, et al. Biological corneal inlay for presbyopia derived from small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Sci Rep. 2018;8:1831.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

128. Liu R, Zhao J, Xu Y, Li M, Niu L, Liu H, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted corneal small incision allogenic intrastromal lenticule implantation in monkeys: a Pilot Study. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015;56:3715–20.

     CAS  Google Scholar 

129. Damgaard IB, Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J. Biological lenticule implantation for correction of hyperopia: an ex vivo study in human corneas. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:245–52.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

130. Barraquer JI. Modification of refraction by means of intracorneal inclusions. Int Ophthalmol Clin. 1966;6:53–78.

     CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

131. Barraquer JI. Keratophakia. Trans ophthalmological societies U Kingd. 1972;92:499–516.

     CAS  Google Scholar 

132. Garza EB, Gomez S, Chayet A, Dishler J. One-year safety and efficacy results of a hydrogel inlay to improve near vision in patients with emmetropic presbyopia. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:166–72.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

133. Malandrini A, Martone G, Menabuoni L, Catanese AM, Tosi GM, Balestrazzi A, et al. Bifocal refractive corneal inlay implantation to improve near vision in emmetropic presbyopic patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1962–72.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

134. Yilmaz OF, Bayraktar S, Agca A, Yilmaz B, McDonald MB, van de Pol C. Intracorneal inlay for the surgical correction of presbyopia. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1921–7.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

135. Mulet ME, Alio JL, Knorz MC. Hydrogel intracorneal inlays for the correction of hyperopia: outcomes and complications after 5 years of follow-up. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1455–60. 1460.e1451.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

136. Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL. The use of intracorneal ring segments in keratoconus. Eye Vis. 2016;3:8.

     Google Scholar 

137. Vega-Estrada A, Alio JL, Brenner LF, Javaloy J, Plaza Puche AB, Barraquer RI, et al. Outcome analysis of intracorneal ring segments for the treatment of keratoconus based on visual, refractive, and aberrometric impairment. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155:575–84.e571.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

138. Lindstrom RL, Macrae SM, Pepose JS, Hoopes PC Sr. Corneal inlays for presbyopia correction. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013;24:281–7.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

139. Konstantopoulos A, Mehta JS. Surgical compensation of presbyopia with corneal inlays. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2015;12:341–52.

     CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

140. Arlt E, Krall E, Moussa S, Grabner G, Dexl A. Implantable inlay devices for presbyopia: the evidence to date. Clin Ophthalmol. 2015;9:129–37.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

141. Whitman J, Dougherty PJ, Parkhurst GD, Olkowski J, Slade SG, Hovanesian J, et al. Treatment of presbyopia in emmetropes using a shape-changing corneal inlay: one-year clinical outcomes. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:466–75.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

142. Yoo A, Kim JY, Kim MJ, Tchah H. Hydrogel inlay for presbyopia: objective and subjective visual outcomes. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:454–60.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

143. Limnopoulou AN, Bouzoukis DI, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI, Plainis S, Pallikaris AI, et al. Visual outcomes and safety of a refractive corneal inlay for presbyopia using femtosecond laser. J Refract Surg. 2013;29:12–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

144. Baily C, Kohnen T, O’Keefe M. Preloaded refractive-addition corneal inlay to compensate for presbyopia implanted using a femtosecond laser: one-year visual outcomes and safety. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:1341–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

145. Vukich JA, Durrie DS, Pepose JS, Thompson V, van de Pol C, Lin L. Evaluation of the small-aperture intracorneal inlay: Three-year results from the cohort of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2018;44:541–56.

146. Chen LJ, Chang YJ, Kuo JC, Rajagopal R, Azar DT. Metaanalysis of cataract development after phakic intraocular lens surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:1181–200.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

147. Huang D, Schallhorn SC, Sugar A, Farjo AA, Majmudar PA, Trattler WB, et al. Phakic intraocular lens implantation for the correction of myopia: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:2244–58.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

148. Barsam A, Allan BD. Excimer laser refractive surgery versus phakic intraocular lenses for the correction of moderate to high myopia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014:CD007679. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007679.pub4.

149. Nanavaty MA, Daya SM. Refractive lens exchange versus phakic intraocular lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:54–61.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

150. Pop M, Payette Y. Refractive lens exchange versus iris-claw Artisan phakic intraocular lens for hyperopia. J Refract Surg. 2004;20:20–4.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

151. Packer M. Meta-analysis and review: effectiveness, safety, and central port design of the intraocular collamer lens. Clin Ophthalmol. 2016;10:1059–77.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

152. Shimizu K, Kamiya K, Igarashi A, Kobashi H. Long-term comparison of posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole (Hole ICL and Conventional ICL) implantation for moderate to high myopia and myopic astigmatism: consort-compliant article. Medicine. 2016;95:e3270.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

153. Alio JL, Mulet ME. Presbyopia correction with an anterior chamber phakic multifocal intraocular lens. Ophthalmology. 2005;112:1368–74.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

154. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, El Aswad A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange. Surv Ophthalmol. 2014;59:579–98.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

155. Alio JL, Grzybowski A, Romaniuk D. Refractive lens exchange in modern practice: when and when not to do it? Eye Vis. 2014;1:10.

     Google Scholar 

156. Liu YC, Wilkins M, Kim T, Malyugin B, Mehta JS. Cataracts. Lancet. 2017;390:600–12.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

157. Westin O, Koskela T, Behndig A. Epidemiology and outcomes in refractive lens exchange surgery. Acta Ophthalmol. 2015;93:41–5.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

158. Creuzot-Garcher C, Benzenine E, Mariet AS, de Lazzer A, Chiquet C, Bron AM, et al. Incidence of acute postoperative endophthalmitis after cataract surgery: a nationwide study in France from 2005 to 2014. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:1414–20.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

159. Jabbarvand M, Hashemian H, Khodaparast M, Jouhari M, Tabatabaei A, Rezaei S. Endophthalmitis occurring after cataract surgery: outcomes of more than 480 000 cataract surgeries, epidemiologic features, and risk factors. Ophthalmology. 2016;123:295–301.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

160. Behndig A, Montan P, Stenevi U, Kugelberg M, Lundstrom M. One million cataract surgeries: Swedish National Cataract Register 1992-2009. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:1539–45.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

161. Jaycock P, Johnston RL, Taylor H, Adams M, Tole DM, Galloway P, et al. The Cataract National Dataset electronic multi-centre audit of 55,567 operations: updating benchmark standards of care in the United Kingdom and internationally. Eye. 2009;23:38–49.

     CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

162. Lichtinger A, Rootman DS. Intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction: past, present, and future. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:40–6.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

163. Montes-Mico R, Ferrer-Blasco T, Charman WN, Cervino A, Alfonso JF, Fernandez-Vega L. Optical quality of the eye after lens replacement with a pseudoaccommodating intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2008;34:763–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

164. Alio JL, Pinero DP, Plaza-Puche AB, Chan MJ. Visual outcomes and optical performance of a monofocal intraocular lens and a new-generation multifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011;37:241–50.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

165. Yoon CH, Shin IS, Kim MK. Trifocal versus bifocal diffractive intraocular lens implantation after cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange: a meta-analysis. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33:e275.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

166. Rosen E, Alio JL, Dick HB, Dell S, Slade S. Efficacy and safety of multifocal intraocular lenses following cataract and refractive lens exchange: metaanalysis of peer-reviewed publications. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:310–28.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

167. Alio JL. Presbyopic lenses: evidence, masquerade news, and fake news. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol. 2019;8:273–4.

     Google Scholar 

168. Rocha KM. Extended depth of focus IOLs: the next chapter in refractive technology? J Refract Surg. 2017;33:146–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

169. Tarib I, Diakonis VF, Breyer D, Hohn F, Hahn U, Kretz FTA. Outcomes of combining a trifocal and a low-addition bifocal intraocular lens in patients seeking spectacle independence at all distances. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2019;45:620–9.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

170. Dick HB, Piovella M, Vukich J, Vilupuru S, Lin L, Clinical I. Prospective multicenter trial of a small-aperture intraocular lens in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2017;43:956–68.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

171. Liang YL, Jia SB. Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens. Int J Ophthalmol. 2018;11:1028–37.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

172. Alio JL, Alio Del Barrio JL, Vega-Estrada A. Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going. Eye Vis. 2017;4:16.

     Google Scholar 

173. Ale JB, Manns F, Ho A. Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens. Optom Vis Sci. 2011;88:789–94.

     PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

174. Alio JL, Ben-Nun J. Study of the force dynamics at the capsular interface related to ciliary body stimulation in a primate model. J Refract Surg. 2015;31:124–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

175. Alio JL, Ben-nun J, Rodriguez-Prats JL, Plaza AB. Visual and accommodative outcomes 1 year after implantation of an accommodating intraocular lens based on a new concept. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009;35:1671–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

176. Alio JL, Simonov AN, Romero D, Angelov A, Angelov Y, van Lawick W, et al. Analysis of accommodative performance of a new accommodative intraocular lens. J Refract Surg. 2018;34:78–83.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

177. Alio JL, Simonov A, Plaza-Puche AB, Angelov A, Angelov Y, van Lawick W, et al. Visual outcomes and accommodative response of the lumina accommodative intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016;164:37–48.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

178. Sheppard AL, Bashir A, Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN. Accommodating intraocular lenses: a review of design concepts, usage and assessment methods. Clin Exp Optom. 2010;93:441–52.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

179. Solomon KD, Fernandez de Castro LE, Sandoval HP, Biber JM, Groat B, Neff KD, et al. LASIK world literature review: quality of life and patient satisfaction. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:691–701.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

180. Kanellopoulos AJ, Asimellis G. Combined laser in situ keratomileusis and prophylactic high-fluence corneal collagen crosslinking for high myopia: two-year safety and efficacy. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2015;41:1426–33.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

181. Tomita M, Yoshida Y, Yamamoto Y, Mita M, Waring Gt. In vivo confocal laser microscopy of morphologic changes after simultaneous LASIK and accelerated collagen crosslinking for myopia: one-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40:981–90.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

182. Cheema AS, Mozayan A, Channa P. Corneal collagen crosslinking in refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2012;23:251–6.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

183. Ewe SY, Abell RG, Vote BJ. Femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification for cataract extraction and intraocular lens implantation: clinical outcomes review. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2018;29:54–60.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

184. Ding L, Knox WH, Buhren J, Nagy LJ, Huxlin KR. Intratissue refractive index shaping (IRIS) of the cornea and lens using a low-pulse-energy femtosecond laser oscillator. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008;49:5332–9.

     Google Scholar 

185. Whitman J, Hovanesian J, Steinert RF, Koch D, Potvin R. Through-focus performance with a corneal shape-changing inlay: One-year results. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2016;42:965–71.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

186. Beer SMC, Werner L, Nakano EM, Santos RT, Hirai F, Nitschke EJ, et al. A 3-year follow-up study of a new corneal inlay: clinical results and outcomes. Br J Ophthalmol. 2020;104:723–8.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

187. Seyeddain O, Bachernegg A, Riha W, Rückl T, Reitsamer H, Grabner G, et al. Femtosecond laser-assisted small-aperture corneal inlay implantation for corneal compensation of presbyopia: two-year follow-up. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013;39:234–41.

     PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references