Table 1 Associated statistics for Supplemental Fig. S2.

From: Pushing the envelope: the feasibility of using a mailed contrast sensitivity test to prioritise cataract waiting lists

Characteristics of patients who did/did not respond

 

Mean {SD} or %

Group comparison stats

Non-respondents

respondents

Age (years)

74.8 {12.6}

75.1 {9.3}

\({t}_{231}=-0.22,P=0.823\)

Distance from hospital (km)

12.4 {8.3}

11.6 {7.7}

\({t}_{231}=0.79,P=0.428\)

Index of multiple deprivation (rank)

25211 {2097}

25451 {1906}

\({t}_{229}=-0.91,P=0.364\)

Sex

53.6% female

54.6% female

\({{{{{{\rm{\chi }}}}}}}_{(1,N=233)}^{2}=0.03,P=0.875\)

  1. No statistically significant differences were apparent between mean values from the two groups, either in terms of age, ___location, IMD or sex.
Back to article page