Fig. 8: Odor-evoked glomerular responses in Cntnap2−/− mice were of similar strength as WT mice.
From: Robust odor identification in novel olfactory environments in mice

A Average evoked response z-score images of a Cntnap2−/− mice in response to the 20 odors used during the behavior. B Example responses as z-scores from individual glomeruli of a Cntnap2−/− mouse on individual odor presentations and as averages. C Average response per odor plotted against the standard deviation calculated over trials for 5 Cntnap2−/− mice (red dots) and 3 WT mice (black dots). The magenta lines are the fitted functions for both genotypes used to estimate the coefficient of variation and imaging noise levels. D Average activation of the glomeruli produced by individual odors for the 5 Cntnap2−/− mice plotted against average activation for 5 WT mice. The value of r corresponds to the Pearson linear correlation and the blue line is the identity line. E Fraction of glomeruli activated per odor for the 5 Cntnap2−/− mice plotted against the fraction of glomeruli activated in 5 WT mice. The value of r corresponds to the Pearson linear correlation and the blue line is the identity line. F Average activation per odor ± s.e.m. for 5 Cntnap2−/− mice and 5 WT mice. Each symbol is the average activation of one mouse. G Fraction of glomeruli activated per odor with 95% confidence intervals.