Tabel 1 Comparison of Macformer with different augmentation numbers and MacLS on ChEMBL test dataset
Method | aug.a | Recovery (%) | Validity (%) | Uniqueness (%) | Noveltymol (%) | Noveltylinker (%) | Macrocyclization (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Macformerb | None | 54.85 ± 14.28 | 66.74 ± 2.29 | 63.18 ± 6.38 | 89.30 ± 1.94 | 40.56 ± 2.33 | 95.00 ± 0.74 |
×2 | 96.09 ± 0.61 | 80.34 ± 1.38 | 64.43 ± 0.23 | 91.58 ± 0.15 | 58.91 ± 0.36 | 98.62 ± 0.17 | |
×5 | 97.54 ± 0.16 | 81.94 ± 1.42 | 65.36 ± 0.13 | 91.79 ± 0.16 | 62.11 ± 0.65 | 98.80 ± 0.11 | |
×10 | 97.02 ± 0.05 | 82.59 ± 1.57 | 64.44 ± 0.46 | 91.76 ± 0.22 | 60.27 ± 0.96 | 98.46 ± 0.04 | |
MacLS_selfc | / | 0.01 ± 0.01 | 17.05 ± 0.29 | 95.33 ± 0.01 | 100 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100 ± 0.00 |
MacLS_extrac | / | 4.16 ± 0.20 | 89.65 ± 0.03 | 96.32 ± 0.06 | 99.65 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 100 ± 0.00 |