Table 2 Shifts in properties of thermal performance curves (TPCs) for models of predicted suitability of malaria transmission, S(T), due to temperature fluctuations

From: Mean daily temperatures predict the thermal limits of malaria transmission better than hourly rate summation

Model & Fluctuation Regime

Topt ( °C)

Tmax ( °C)

Tbreadth ( °C)

S(Topt)

2) Empirical fluctuating − 3 traits

 DTR 9

−1.2

−0.8

−0.8

−32.0%

 DTR 12

−1.4

−1.8

−1.2

−33.8%

3) Trait-level RS − 3 traits

 DTR 9

−0.1

0.0

0.0

−10.0%

 DTR 12

−0.2

0.0

0.0

−17.1%

4) Trait-level RS - all traits

 DTR 9

−0.2

+4.0

+9.0

−18.1%

 DTR 12

−0.4

+5.3

+11.9

−30.6%

5) S(T)-level RS

 DTR 9

−0.1

+4.0

+9.0

−19.9%

 DTR 12

+0.1

+5.3

+11.9

−32.0%

  1. Differences in thermal optimum (Topt), thermal maximum (Tmax), and thermal breadth (Tbreadth), and the percent change in median S(T) predicted at Topt, compared to the constant temperature model (model 1). Fluctuating models are parameterized with trait TPCs fit from empirical data (model 2: “Empirical fluctuating”) or are calculated using rate summation (RS). Rate summation was used only for the three traits with empirical data (model 3: “Trait-level RS − 3 traits”), for all traits (model 4: “Trait-level RS - all traits”), or directly on the TPC for suitability, S(T), at constant temperatures (model 5: “S(T)-level RS”). Diurnal temperature ranges (DTR) = 9 and 12 °C. Differences calculated using median values. See Table S3 for original parameter values for each model.