Table 1 Comparison of different commercial kits for DNA extraction from rare cells

From: Workflow optimization of whole genome amplification and targeted panel sequencing for CTC mutation detection

Cells

Kit

Protocol

1.5 ml tube

96 well-plate

Comments

HCT116 Fresh

Qiagen QIAamp DNA Micro

Cell Protocol

6–7 pg/cell (~100%)

6-7pg/cell (~100%)

• Cell protocol performs well for a small amount of fresh cells, both in a tube or in a well-plate.

     

• Recommended for small amount of fresh/frozen cells.

 

Qiagen QIAamp DNA Micro

Cell Protocol

0.1–0.5 pg/cell (<1%)

Not Tested

• Not optimal for fixed cells.

  

Tissue Protocol

3–4 pg/cell (~50%)

3–4 pg/cell (~50%)

• Tissue protocol performs well for a small amount of fixed cells.

     

• Selected for further optimization on fixed, permeabilized, immuno-stained cells.

HCT116 Fixed

Qiagen GeneRead DNA FFPE

Standard Protocol

2–3 pg/cell (~30%)

Not Tested

• Not optimal for fixed cells.

     

• Procedure is more complicated, with hazardous chemicals involved.

 

Zymo ZR Genomic DNAâ„¢ Tissue MicroPrep

Standard Protocol

3–4 pg/cell (~50%)

3–4 pg/cell (~50%)

• Could be used as a substitute for Qiagen Micro Kit.

     

• No further optimization has been performed.

 

Life technologies Arcturus® PicoPure® DNA Extraction

Standard Protocol

3–4 pg/cell (~50%)

0.5–1 pg/cell (<10%)

• Simple workflow with Applied Biosystems® Arcturus® LCM instruments.

     

• Small digestion volume causes evaporation during the incubation when using a 96 well-plate.

  1. HCT116 cells were prepared fresh, or fixed with 4% PFA, collected in a 1.5 mL micro-centrifuge tube or in a 96 well-plate (~200–300 cells/experiment, N ≥ 2 per condition). DNA extraction kits tested side-by-side included kits from: Qiagen, Zymo and Life Technologies. One hundred percent DNA recovery was defined assuming a DNA yield of about 6 pg per fresh diploid cell. Qiagen QIAamp DNA Micro Kit was selected for both tissue biopsy and for further optimization on CTC-like samples