Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing

Abstract

Photon loss is the biggest problem for scalable photonic quantum information processing. This issue can be tackled through quantum error correction, provided that the overall photon loss is below a threshold of one-third. However, all reported on-demand and indistinguishable single-photon sources still fall short of this threshold. Here, by using tailor shaped laser pulse excitation on a high-quantum efficiency single quantum dot deterministically coupled to a tunable open microcavity, we simultaneously demonstrate a high-performance source with a low multi-photon error of g(2)(0) = 0.0205(6), photon indistinguishability of 0.9856(13) and overall system efficiency of 0.712(18). This source for the first time reaches the efficiency threshold for scalable photonic quantum computing. With this source, we further demonstrate 1.89(14) dB intensity squeezing, and consecutive 40-photon events with a count rate of 1.67 mHz.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: The design of the QDs in a fully tunable open-cavity set-up.
Fig. 2: High-efficiency single-photon source under shape-optimized pulse excitation.
Fig. 3: System efficiency characterization of the single-photon source.
Fig. 4: Characterization of the pulsed resonance fluorescence single photons.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. Source Data are provided with this paper.

References

  1. Zhong, H.-S. et al. Quantum computational advantage using photons. Science 370, 1460–1463 (2020).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Arute, F. et al. Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor. Nature 574, 505–510 (2019).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, E. & Vazirani, U. Quantum complexity theory. In Proc. 25th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 11–20 (ACM, 1993).

  4. Bharti, K. et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev. Modern Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Aharonov, D. & Ben-Or, M. Fault-tolerant quantum computation with constant error. In Proc. 29th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing 176–188 (ACM, 1997).

  6. Grassl, M., Beth, T. & Pellizzari, T. Codes for the quantum erasure channel. Phys. Rev. A 56, 33 (1997).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Wasilewski, W. & Banaszek, K. Protecting an optical qubit against photon loss. Phys. Rev. A 75, 042316 (2007).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kieling, K., Rudolph, T. & Eisert, J. Percolation, renormalization, and quantum computing with nondeterministic gates. Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 130501 (2007).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gimeno-Segovia, M., Shadbolt, P., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. From three-photon Greenberger–Horne–Zeilinger states to ballistic universal quantum computation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 020502 (2015).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Varnava, M., Browne, D. E. & Rudolph, T. How good must single photon sources and detectors be for efficient linear optical quantum computation? Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 060502 (2008).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Aspect, A., Grangier, P. & Roger, G. Experimental tests of realistic local theories via Bell’s theorem. Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 460 (1981).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhong, H.-S. et al. Phase-programmable gaussian boson sampling using stimulated squeezed light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 180502 (2021).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Madsen, L. S. et al. Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor. Nature 606, 75–81 (2022).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wang, H. et al. Boson sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1014-dimensional Hilbert space. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 250503 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhong, H.-S. et al. 12-photon entanglement and scalable scattershot boson sampling with optimal entangled-photon pairs from parametric down-conversion. Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 250505 (2018).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Paesani, S. et al. Near-ideal spontaneous photon sources in silicon quantum photonics. Nat. Commun. 11, 2505 (2020).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaneda, F. & Kwiat, P. G. High-efficiency single-photon generation via large-scale active time multiplexing. Sci. Adv. 5, eaaw8586 (2019).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Ding, X. et al. On-demand single photons with high extraction efficiency and near-unity indistinguishability from a resonantly driven quantum dot in a micropillar. Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 020401 (2016).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang, H. et al. Towards optimal single-photon sources from polarized microcavities. Nat. Photon. 13, 770–775 (2019).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399–403 (2021).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Javadi, A. et al. Cavity-enhanced excitation of a quantum dot in the picosecond regime. New J. Phys. 25, 093027 (2023).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tomm, N. et al. Tuning the mode splitting of a semiconductor microcavity with uniaxial stress. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 054061 (2021).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Weiner, A. M. Femtosecond pulse shaping using spatial light modulators. Rev. Sci. Instruments 71, 1929–1960 (2000).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Mandel, L. Sub-poissonian photon statistics in resonance fluorescence. Optics Lett. 4, 205–207 (1979).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Chu, X.-L., Götzinger, S. & Sandoghdar, V. A single molecule as a high-fidelity photon gun for producing intensity-squeezed light. Nat. Photon. 11, 58–62 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, H. et al. Observation of intensity squeezing in resonance fluorescence from a solid-state device. Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 153601 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu, P. et al. Detecting single infrared photons toward optimal system detection efficiency. Optics Exp. 28, 36884 (2020).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang, J. et al. Detecting telecom single photons with 99.5(–2.07)(+0.5)% system detection efficiency and high time resolution. APL Photon. 6, 036114 (2021).

  29. Resta, G. V. et al. Gigahertz detection rates and dynamic photon-number resolution with superconducting nanowire arrays. Nano Lett. 23, 6018–6026 (2023).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang, T. et al. Superconducting single-photon detector with a speed of 5 GHz and a photon number resolution of 61. Photon. Res. 12, 1328–1333 (2024).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanbury Brown, R. & Twiss, R. Q. in A Source Book in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 1900–1975 8–12 (Harvard Univ. Press, 1979).

  32. Hong, C.-K., Ou, Z.-Y. & Mandel, L. Measurement of subpicosecond time intervals between two photons by interference. Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2044 (1987).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Glauber, R. J. The quantum theory of optical coherence. Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, H. et al. Near-transform-limited single photons from an efficient solid-state quantum emitter. Phys. Rev. Let. 116, 213601 (2016).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kuhlmann, A. V. et al. Transform-limited single photons from a single quantum dot. Nat. Commun. 6, 8204 (2015).

    ADS  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Our work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 12012422 and 62474168), the National Key R&D Program of China (grant no. 2019YFA0308700), the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the Anhui Initiative in Quantum Information Technologies (grant no. AHY060000), the Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (grant no. 2019SHZDZX01), the Innovation Program for Quantum Science and Technology (grant no. 2021ZD0301400, 2021ZD0300204), Chinese Academy of Sciences Project for Young Scientists in Basic Research (grant no. YSBR-112) and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (grant no. 2021M703102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.-Y.L. and J.-W.P. conceived and designed the experiments. R.-Z.L., J.-Y.Z., Z.-X.G, Q.-H.Z. and Y.-H.H. grew and fabricated the quantum dot samples. M.-C.X. and L.-J.W. fabricated the cavity mirror. G.-Y.Z., H.-L.L., M.-C.C., H.W. and Y.-M.H. contributed materials and analysis tools. X.D. and Y.-P.G. performed the optical experiments. X.D., Y.-P.G. and G.-Y.Z. analysed the experimental data. X.D. and C.-Y.L. wrote the paper with input from all authors. C.-Y.L. and J.-W.P. supervised the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yong-Heng Huo, Chao-Yang Lu or Jian-Wei Pan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Photonics thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–6, Discussion, and Supplementary Tables 1 and 2.

Source data

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, X., Guo, YP., Xu, MC. et al. High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing. Nat. Photon. 19, 387–391 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01639-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01639-8

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing