Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Article
  • Published:

Ångström-tunable polarization-resolved solid-state photon sources

Abstract

The development of high-quality solid-state photon sources is essential to nano-optics, quantum photonics and related fields. A key objective of this research area is to develop tunable photon sources that not only enhance the performance but also offer dynamic functionalities. However, the realization of compact and robust photon sources with precise and wide-range tunability remains a long-standing challenge. Moreover, the lack of an effective approach to integrate nanoscale photon sources with dynamic systems has hindered tunability beyond mere spectral adjustments, such as simultaneous polarization control. Here we propose a platform based on quantum-emitter-embedded metasurfaces (QEMS) integrated with a micro-electromechanical system (MEMS)-positioned microcavity, enabling on-chip multidegree control of solid-state photon sources. Using MEMS–QEMS, we show that typically broadband room-temperature emission from nanodiamonds containing nitrogen-vacancy centres can be narrowed to 3.7 nm and dynamically tuned with ångström resolution. Furthermore, we design a wavelength–polarization-multiplexed QEMS and demonstrate polarization-resolved control of the MEMS–QEMS emission in a wide wavelength range (650–700 nm) along with polarization switching at submillisecond timescales. We believe that the proposed MEMS–QEMS platform can be adapted for most existing quantum emitters, significantly expanding their room-temperature capabilities and thereby enhancing their potential for advanced photonic applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: MEMS–QEMS integrated platform for tunable photon sources.
Fig. 2: Demonstration of narrow bandwidth and ångström-level tunability of photon emission.
Fig. 3: Wavelength–polarization-multiplexed QEMS for photon emission of different polarizations encoded in different wavelengths.
Fig. 4: Dynamic photon sources with wide-range tunability and polarization switching.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data that support the findings of the study are provided in the article and its extended data and Supplementary Information. Data are also available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Aharonovich, I., Englund, D. & Toth, M. Solid-state single-photon emitters. Nat. Photonics 10, 631–641 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, Z. et al. Atomic optical antennas in solids. Nat. Photonics 18, 1113–1120 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang, J., Sciarrino, F., Laing, A. & Thompson, M. G. Integrated photonic quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 14, 273–284 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Sun, S., Kim, H., Luo, Z., Solomon, G. S. & Waks, E. A single-photon switch and transistor enabled by a solid-state quantum memory. Science 361, 57–60 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Utzat, H. et al. Coherent single-photon emission from colloidal lead halide perovskite quantum dots. Science 363, 1068–1072 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jelezko, F. & Wrachtrup, J. Single defect centres in diamond: a review. Phys. Status Solidi A 203, 3207–3225 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ates, S. et al. Non-resonant dot–cavity coupling and its potential for resonant single-quantum-dot spectroscopy. Nat. Photonics 3, 724–728 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, S. et al. Super-resolved snapshot hyperspectral imaging of solid-state quantum emitters for high-throughput integrated quantum technologies. Nat. Photonics 18, 967–974 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, J. et al. Engineering quantum light sources with flat optics. Adv. Mater. 36, 2313589 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kan, Y. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Advances in metaphotonics empowered single photon emission. Adv. Opt. Mater. 11, 2202759 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Koenderink, A. F. Single-photon nanoantennas. ACS Photonics 4, 710–722 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen, B. et al. Bright solid-state sources for single photons with orbital angular momentum. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 302–307 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Javadi, A. et al. Spin–photon interface and spin-controlled photon switching in a nanobeam waveguide. Nat. Nanotechnol. 13, 398–403 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akselrod, G. M. et al. Probing the mechanisms of large Purcell enhancement in plasmonic nanoantennas. Nat. Photonics 8, 835–840 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benz, F. et al. Single-molecule optomechanics in “picocavities”. Science 354, 726–729 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bogdanov, S. I. et al. Ultrabright room-temperature sub-nanosecond emission from single nitrogen-vacancy centers coupled to nanopatch antennas. Nano Lett. 18, 4837–4844 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kan, Y. et al. Metasurface‐enabled generation of circularly polarized single photons. Adv. Mater. 32, 1907832 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X. et al. On-chip generation of single-photon circularly polarized single-mode vortex beams. Sci. Adv. 9, eadh0725 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Komisar, D., Kumar, S., Kan, Y., Wu, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Generation of radially polarized single photons with plasmonic bullseye antennas. ACS Photonics 8, 2190–2196 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, X. et al. Ultracompact single‐photon sources of linearly polarized vortex beams. Adv. Mater. 36, 2304495 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu, X. et al. Off-normal polarized single-photon emission with anisotropic holography metasurfaces. Nano Lett. 24, 13867–13873 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ha, S. T. et al. Optoelectronic metadevices. Science 386, eadm7442 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Forbes, A., De Oliveira, M. & Dennis, M. R. Structured light. Nat. Photonics 15, 253–262 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Nape, I., Sephton, B., Ornelas, P., Moodley, C. & Forbes, A. Quantum structured light in high dimensions. APL Photon. 8, 051101 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Nowak, A. K. et al. Deterministic and electrically tunable bright single-photon source. Nat. Commun. 5, 3240 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Larocque, H. et al. Tunable quantum emitters on large-scale foundry silicon photonics. Nat. Commun. 15, 5781 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Albrecht, R., Bommer, A., Deutsch, C., Reichel, J. & Becher, C. Coupling of a single nitrogen-vacancy center in diamond to a fiber-based microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 243602 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Casabone, B. et al. Dynamic control of Purcell enhanced emission of erbium ions in nanoparticles. Nat. Commun. 12, 3570 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Xia, K. et al. Tunable microcavities coupled to rare-earth quantum emitters. Optica 9, 445–450 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yang, J. et al. Tunable quantum dots in monolithic Fabry–Perot microcavities for high-performance single-photon sources. Light Sci. Appl. 13, 33 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tomm, N. et al. A bright and fast source of coherent single photons. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 399–403 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ding, X. et al. High-efficiency single-photon source above the loss-tolerant threshold for efficient linear optical quantum computing. Nat. Photonics 19, 387–391 (2025).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meng, C. et al. Dynamic piezoelectric MEMS-based optical metasurfaces. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5639 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Meng, C., Thrane, P. C., Ding, F. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Full-range birefringence control with piezoelectric MEMS-based metasurfaces. Nat. Commun. 13, 2071 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ding, F., Meng, C. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Electrically tunable optical metasurfaces. Photonics Insights 3, R07–R07 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Andersen, S. K. H. et al. Hybrid plasmonic Bullseye antennas for efficient photon collection. ACS Photonics 5, 692–698 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bakke, T. et al. A novel ultra-planar, long-stroke and low-voltage piezoelectric micromirror. J. Micromech. Microeng. 20, 064010 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kan, Y. et al. High-dimensional spin-orbital single-photon sources. Sci. Adv. 10, eadq6298 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tang, H. et al. On-chip multi-degree-of-freedom control of two-dimensional materials. Nature 632, 1038–1044 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Dahl-Hansen, R., Gjessing, J., Mardilovich, P., Fragkiadakis, C. & Thorstensen, J. Reliable Pb(Zr, Ti)O3-based thin film piezoelectric micromirrors for space-applications. Appl. Phys. Lett. 121, 132901 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Kan, Y., Liu, X., Kumar, S. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. Multichannel quantum emission with on-chip emitter-coupled holographic metasurfaces. ACS Nano 17, 20308–20314 (2023).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Chen, O. et al. Compact high-quality CdSe–CdS core–shell nanocrystals with narrow emission linewidths and suppressed blinking. Nat. Mater. 12, 445–451 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Iwasaki, T. et al. Tin-vacancy quantum emitters in diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 253601 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Jantzen, U. et al. Nanodiamonds carrying silicon-vacancy quantum emitters with almost lifetime-limited linewidths. New J. Phys. 18, 073036 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Asbahi, M. et al. Large area directed self-assembly of sub-10 nm particles with single particle positioning resolution. Nano Lett. 15, 6066–6070 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Pambudi, M. T. et al. Deterministic positioning of few aqueous colloidal quantum dots. Nanoscale 16, 18339–18347 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Meng, C., Thrane, P. C., Wang, C., Ding, F. & Bozhevolnyi, S. I. MEMS-tunable topological bilayer metasurfaces for reconfigurable dual-state phase control. Optica 11, 1556–1566 (2024).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bartholomew, J. G., De Oliveira Lima, K., Ferrier, A. & Goldner, P. Optical line width broadening mechanisms at the 10 kHz level in Eu3+: Y2O3 nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 17, 778–787 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Erhard, M., Krenn, M. & Zeilinger, A. Advances in high-dimensional quantum entanglement. Nat. Rev. Phys. 2, 365–381 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Lukin, D. M. et al. Spectrally reconfigurable quantum emitters enabled by optimized fast modulation. npj Quantum Inf. 6, 80 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Pirandola, S. et al. Advances in quantum cryptography. Adv. Opt. Photonics 12, 1012–1236 (2020).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge T. Yezekyan, O. Takayama and V. Zenin for assistance with the experiment. We also acknowledge the support from European Union’s Horizon Europe research and innovation programme under the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action grant 101064471 (Y.K.), Research Council of Norway grant 323322 (P.C.V.T.), Villum Fonden 50343 (C.M.) and Villum Kann Rasmussen Foundation (Award in Technical and Natural Sciences 2019) (S.I.B.).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Y.K. and S.I.B. conceived the idea. Y.K. performed the theoretical modelling. Y.K., P.C.V.T., X.L. and R.M. fabricated the samples. Y.K. and X.L. with assistance from S.K. and C.M. performed the experimental measurements. Y.K., S.K., X.L., P.C.V.T., C.M. and S.I.B. analysed the data. S.I.B. and Y.K. supervised the project. Y.K. wrote the paper with contributions from all authors.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yinhui Kan or Sergey I. Bozhevolnyi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Photonics thanks Na Liu and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Extended data

Extended Data Fig. 1 Fabrication process of MEMS-QEMS device.

a Deposition of a 150 nm Ag layer followed by a 20 nm SiO2 layer on a MEMS chip from 150 mm SOI wafer that are bonded to a support wafer. b Fabrication of the alignment gold markers through a combined process, including EBL, gold deposition, and lift-off. c Spin coating the solution of NVs-NDs onto the surface. d Locating the positions of NVs-NDs relative to the prefabricated alignment markers in a 100 × 100 μm2 area, using the dark-field microscope image and a developed precise alignment procedure. Subsequently, QEMS (that is, Bullseyes and multiplexed metasurfaces) are fabricated around NVs-NDs by EBL. e The support chip is removed by dissolving the waferbond with waferbond remover. f The DBR is fabricated by magnetron sputtering. g The DBR is mounted onto the MEMS mirror using Loctite 401. h The device is assembled with a PCB and wirebonded.

Extended Data Fig. 2 Experimental setup for characterizing MEMS-QEMS.

a Sample stage. A piezo-stage allows for locating NVs-NDs in MEMS-QEMS. Actuation voltages applied on MEMS-QEMS are controlled in real time via a computer-connected controller. b Excitation module. A 532 nm incident laser is used for exciting NV-NDs. Pulse laser is used for lifetime measurements. c Illumination module. Enabling finding the fabricated QEMS inside the microcavity. d Characterization module for measuring emission pattern, response time, stability, and decay-rate. Fluorescence photon rates are recorded using avalanche photo diodes (APDs), with excitation lasers filtered by a set of dichroic mirrors (DM) and a long pass filter (LPF). e Characterization module for acquiring spectra using the spectrometers (Ultra 888 USB3 –BV, Andor; QE pro, Ocean Optics). CW: continuous wave, RP: radial polarization converter, PBS: polarized beam splitter, PH: pinhole, DM: dichroic mirror, LP: linear polarizer, LPF: 550 nm long pass filter, BPF: 650 nm ± 5 nm, 670 nm ± 5 nm, and 700 nm ± 5 nm. FM: flip mirror, GM: galvanometric mirror. APD: avalanche photodiode.

Extended Data Fig. 3 The relationship between emission peak wavelength and voltage of channel C7 (under Vc) with a fine step of 50 mV.

The results show a quasi-linear relationship between the emission peak wavelength and the actuation voltage, featuring an average wavelength shift of 0.8 Å per 50 mV.

Extended Data Fig. 4 Dynamical tunable polarized solid-state photon sources under voltage Vc.

a Measured photon emission spectra with LPx and LPy polarizations under actuation voltage Vc. The grey shaded area indicates the normalized spectrum of the QEMS before integration into the MEMS-DBR microcavity. b Measured far- field emission patterns at λ = 650 nm, λ = 670 nm, and λ = 700 nm with different polarizations. The white circles indicate NA = 0.5.

Extended Data Fig. 5 Realization of simultaneous dual- emission peaks at 650 nm and 700 nm.

a Measured spectrum of photon emission exhibiting dual-emission peaks at 650 nm and 700 nm, by adjusting the gap distance to around 3.689 µm. The grey shaded area indicates the normalized spectrum of the QEMS before integration into the MEMS-DBR microcavity. b Measured far-field emission patterns at λ = 650 nm and λ = 700 nm with different polarizations. The white circles indicate NA = 0.5.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figs. 1–7 and Tables 1–3.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kan, Y., Thrane, P.C.V., Liu, X. et al. Ångström-tunable polarization-resolved solid-state photon sources. Nat. Photon. (2025). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01709-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-025-01709-x

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing