Extended Data Fig. 2: Cell-type specific sEV enrichment of miRNAs and sEV versus cell housekeeping miRNAs. Effect of percentage of CG and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) in miRNA sorting or cellular retention. | Nature

Extended Data Fig. 2: Cell-type specific sEV enrichment of miRNAs and sEV versus cell housekeeping miRNAs. Effect of percentage of CG and Gibbs free energy (ΔG) in miRNA sorting or cellular retention.

From: MicroRNA sequence codes for small extracellular vesicle release and cellular retention

Extended Data Fig. 2

a) Normalized gene expression of representative miRNAs showing cell-type specific sEV enrichment: miR-696 (BAT), miR-770-5p (C2C12), miR-1927 (3T3-L1), miR-1931 (AML12) and miR-718 (SVEC). Average Ct from the whole miRNA profile was used for normalization for each sample (n=3-4). *P≤0.05 (Limma t-test). b) Normalized gene expression of two representative miRNAs (miR-138-5p and miR-501-5p) showing similar sEV and cellular expression for each cell type. Average Ct from the whole miRNA profile was used for normalization for each sample (n=3-4). c) Percentage of CG content in the sequence of the miRNAs: those sorted into the sEV in all cells are shown in red (n=13); those sorted into sEV in 3 or 4 of the five cell types are shown in green (n=90); those not enriched in either sEV or cells are shown in black (n=109); those retained in 3 or 4 cell types are shown in pink (n=97); and those retained in the cell bodies of all cell types are shown in blue (n=43). d) The calculated Gibbs free energy (ΔG) for each of the miRNA in each of the five groups described in panel c. For c, d lines indicate mean value, **P≤0.01, *** P≤0.001 between the indicated group and the other four groups (ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc test in c, d). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM.

Back to article page