Fig. 6: Comparison of a single-cell atlas between human and mouse limb. | Nature

Fig. 6: Comparison of a single-cell atlas between human and mouse limb.

From: A human embryonic limb cell atlas resolved in space and time

Fig. 6

a, Overview of mouse sampling and the experimental scheme. The stars indicate timepoints. b, Overview of the analysis pipeline to integrate human and mouse scRNA-seq data. c, MultiMAP layout of integrated cells, coloured by integrated cell-type annotation or species (bottom right). Cluster abbreviations are the same as in Fig. 1. d, Broad cell-type proportions of each scRNA-seq library, with dissection region, ___location and species labelled at the bottom. NC, neural crest. e,f, Triangular diagrams (e) showing the cell-type proportion biases towards the proximal, middle or distal region of the human and mouse forelimb (left) and hindlimb (right), and a scatter plot (f) showing the fraction of hindlimb representation of each cell type. Each cell type or mean is represented by a circle (human) and a square (mouse), with size (square of diameter) denoting the average number of cells per segment (proximal, middle or distal).

Source Data

Back to article page