Extended Data Fig. 4: Correlations between proteins and transcripts throughout endurance training.

a) Number of tissues in which each gene, including features mapped to genes from all omes, is training-regulated. Only differential features from the subset of tissues with deep molecular profiling (lung, gastrocnemius, subcutaneous white adipose, kidney, liver, and heart) and the subset of omes that were profiled in all six of these tissues (DNA methylation, chromatin accessibility, transcriptomics, global proteomics, phosphoproteomics, multiplexed immunoassays) were considered. Numbers above each bar indicate the number of genes that are differential in exactly the number of tissues indicated on the x-axis. b) Pathways significantly enriched by tissue-specific training-regulated genes represented in Fig. 2a (q-value < 0.1). KEGG and Reactome pathways were queried, and redundant pathways were removed (i.e., those with an overlap of 80% or greater with an existing pathway). c) Heatmaps showing the Pearson correlation between the TRNSCRPT and PROT timewise summary statistics (z- and t-scores, respectively) (top, gene-level) and pathway-level enrichment results (Gene Set Enrichment Analysis normalized enrichment scores) (bottom, pathway-level). d) Scatter plots of pathway GSEA NES of the TRNSCRPT and PROT datasets in the seven tissues for which these data were acquired. Pathways showing high discordance or agreement across TRNSCRPT and PROT and with functional relevance or general interest were highlighted.