Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Comment
  • Published:

A technical approach to global plant genome editing regulation

The Innovate Genomics Institute brought together regulators from 16 countries to discuss global capacity building for the regulation of genome-edited crops. The workshop provided insights into the suitable use of technical analyses to validate edits and raised future considerations regarding regulation reporting, offering suggestions to help countries meet their objectives in the ever-growing landscape of genome editing techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Fig. 1: Pre-meeting survey results completed by 23 participants and potential participants to the IGI workshop indicating the testing approaches and accepted tests by nations for genome edited products.
Fig. 2: Example data for genome editing validation in a Cas9-mediated knockout.
Fig. 3: Example data for transgene outcrossing in a Cas9-mediated knockout.

References

  1. Karavolias, N. G., Horner, W., Abugu, M. N. & Evanega, S. N. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 5, 685801 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pixley, K. V. et al. Nat. Genet. 54, 364–367 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sprink, T. & Wilhelm, R. in A Roadmap for Plant Genome Editing (eds. Ricroch, A. et al.) 425–435 (Springer Nature, 2024).

  4. Whelan, A. I., Gutti, P. & Lema, M. A. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 8, 303 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Bullion, A. & Malhotra, B. Gene-edited crops market growth spurred by regulatory progress and approvals. S&P Global https://qa.www.spglobal.com/commodityinsights/en/ci/research-analysis/gene-edited-crops-market-growth-spurred-by-regulatory-progress.html (2023).

  6. Wolter, F., Schindele, P. & Puchta, H. BMC Plant Biol. 19, 176 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, Y., Malzahn, A. A., Sretenovic, S. & Qi, Y. Nat. Plants 5, 778–794 (2019).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmad, A., Jamil, A. & Munawar, N. Front. Plant Sci. 14, 1232938 (2023).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Goralogia, G. S., Redick, T. P. & Strauss, S. H. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 57, 683–699 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Shillito, R. D. et al. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant. 57, 595–608 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Naito, Y., Hino, K., Bono, H. & Ui-Tei, K. Bioinformatics 31, 1120–1123 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Bessoltane, N. et al. Sci. Rep. 12, 9330 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Graham, N. et al. Plant Physiol. 183, 1453–1471 (2020).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sun, Y., Shang, L., Zhu, Q.-H., Fan, L. & Guo, L. Trends Plant Sci. 27, 391–401 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity: Text and Annexes (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, 2000).

  16. Li, S. et al. Nature 602, 455–460 (2022).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the ‘Regulatory Capacity Building Workshop for Genome-edited Agriculture’ trainers and administrative staff (D. Savage, L. Tripathi, N. Karavolias, C. Williams, K. Markel, B. Staskawicz, S. Abrahamson, Z. Lyons and D. O’Neal) for their efforts to achieve a successful workshop in Berkeley; the other workshop attendees M. Takeuchi, S. Singh, V. Chinnusamy and S. Chakravarthy for their participation and input in the discussion sessions; the USDA-APHIS team for critical reviews and feedback that helped to improve the manuscript; and the Innovative Genomics Institute and the University of California, Berkeley for the use of seminar rooms and laboratory facilities for training.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.K. and E.N. initiated and ran the capacity building workshop where the information presented in the manuscript was discussed. E.G. developed the training materials and conducted hands-on laboratory exercises. Regulators and representatives from capacity building organizations, K.C.B., A.M., M.K., C.S., R.L.M., E.K., P.R., J.A., E.M., M.A.A., A.B.M.K., L.C., M.A., D.M.J.B.S., D.W., D.A., G.P.E. and C.K., provided input on individual country regulations, discussion of the types of acceptable test and reviewed the manuscript. E.G., E.N. and M.K. drafted, edited and finalized the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Evan Groover or Melinda Kliegman.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Groover, E., Njuguna, E., Bansal, K.C. et al. A technical approach to global plant genome editing regulation. Nat Biotechnol 42, 1773–1780 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02489-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-024-02489-5

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing